slater71
(586 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:13 AM
Original message |
Lieberman to announce what he will do on FOX.. coming up! |
|
Who ever posted this the other day is 100% correct. He is now looking for the republican support.
|
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I think he'll split the Republican vote - not the Dem vote |
|
I think most Dems are ticked that he's so selfish that he can't except the results of the Dem primary.
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. The danger is that he'll split both... |
|
...and with the Republican candidate polling about 13% in a 3-way race, we have a lot more to lose than they do.
That said, I think Lamont's win will substantially change the 3-way poll numbers we've seen.
|
Rageneau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
16. You know, I could actually like Lieberman if he were a republican. |
|
Just like I sometimes like Snowe, Chaffee, Hagel, Collins and McCain. As a republican, Joe would be a reasonable, bipartisan guy.
I think his only political future is as a republican. Lord knows, he's not good enough to be a democrat anymore.
|
BR_Parkway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
18. If the challenger shows video of Clinton stumping for Lieberman, there's |
|
a section of the population who will vote against him every time - just because of the Rush inspired viceral hatred they have of anything Clinton
|
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:15 AM
Response to Original message |
2. FOX will have the guy on for an hour of free air time a day until NOV. |
Ganja Ninja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. It's an easy way to sort out the real Democrats from the Dino's. |
|
Just see which one is being promoted on FOX vs which one is being demonized.
|
fasttense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:15 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Ann the man had it right. He should stop pretending and just run |
|
as a republic. How did the democratic party get stuck with this neocon?
|
Grateful for Hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He is emphasizing the evil blogger meme, and, he emphasizes the "narrow victory" of Lamont.
It would be nice to see the networks give Lamont equal time. I guess that would be too much to ask.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. Oddly ** had a much narrower victory (of sorts) over Kerry |
|
and he got a mandate with guckert. What a peculiar world we live in.
|
Pierre.Suave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. That pissed me off too! |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 06:52 AM by Breeze54
What happened to Lamont? I mean what happened to having the VICTOR on tv? This is VERY telling, imho! Unbelievable! Fuck Joe and ABC, NBC, & CBS! He is grouping everybody in CT. who voted against him, as "those evil 'way left' voters!" (quotes mine) He just dissed half of the people who voted last night! :grr: Half the Democrats in his state!
He was on every morning show also! He speaks like a true repig! argh!
I need more :donut: ;)
|
Grateful for Hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. CNN will have Lamont on at 8:15 ET |
|
Will wonders never cease! It will be interesting to see how he is questioned - particularly about his blogger support.
|
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. I don't buy cable...would |
|
you give us all a run down on the interview? What's said, etc? Thanks! ;)
|
unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:18 AM
Response to Original message |
5. he's essentially running as a republican now. |
|
in fact, i bet the republican powers that be put pressure on the actual republican nominee to drop out!
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. The Democratic Party needs to open up with both barrels on |
|
this sucker in November. Spare nothing.
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I believe that some of the national powers in the republican party are pressuring the state machine to endorse Joe.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:19 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 06:20 AM by depakid
Shows just where the man's loyalties lie.
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:32 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Two results in November out of three work for Bush apologists |
|
Lieberman wins, you get a yes-man for 90 percent of Bush's stuff ...
Fill-in-the-blank republican (yes, he has a name, but who really knows it, nationally?) wins, Bush gets 100 percent of his stuff passed.
Lamont wins in November, we wait and see ...
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Do ya want a Republican or a Republican wannabe? |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 06:34 AM by Skidmore
Joe and the Rs....
Ned wins.
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. If Lieberman takes it in November |
|
and Bush gives him the job he's been offering Joe, who appoints the Senator to replace him? The Governor? A special election
|
IDemo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 07:19 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Should there really be a Liebertarian Party? n/t |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 07:20 AM by IDemo
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |