jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 12:25 PM
Original message |
Who will be the chair of the Homeland Security Committee if Lieberman gone |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 12:26 PM by jsamuel
(oh and Dems win back the Senate)
It seems that he would be the head if he stays (I or D). So, who would be head if he is gone?
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. He should be stripped of that chair NOW. |
|
As well as any other committee memberships.
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Wouldn't Reed be next in line? |
ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
3. He should be out. He's no longer part of the Democratic Party. |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 12:31 PM by ThomCat
So he should no longer hold any seats that are reserved for the Democratic Party.
But I don't know if they'll boot him yet, much less if they have a replacement lined up.
|
MysteryToMyself
(302 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I didn't know he was head of homeland security |
|
If he was head, when Katrina happened, then he didn't make the Katrina area secure. I know it was a hurricane, but if it had been bombed the result would have been as tragic. Even the emergency phones couldn't be used to contact the right people like police/fire/ambulance.
That is just one more reason to be glad he didn't win.
Joe is saying that he is main stream and those who voted for Lamont are extreme left. Unbelievable.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |