Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Response from Lieberman re Alito

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Autumn Colors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:13 PM
Original message
Response from Lieberman re Alito
Edited on Thu Jan-19-06 08:14 PM by Autumn Colors
Well, more like a nonresponse from Joementum... Here it is, but the short version is that he doesn't have enough info about Alito.
----------------
Dear Mrs. Anderson,

Thank you for contacting me to express your views on the nomination of Circuit Court Judge Samuel Alito to fill the U.S. Supreme Court vacancy to
be left by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. I appreciate your views on this serious issue, and I welcome the opportunity to respond.

Considering nominees to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court is an important responsibility entrusted by the Constitution to the United States Senate. Senators must take care to ensure that prospective appointees are not only qualified, but also capable of analyzing and applying our laws and the Constitution and deciding cases in a wise and impartial manner.

I have always taken the Senate's advice and consent role very seriously, especially when it comes to the U.S. Supreme Court; and I believe that my general desire to give the President's nominees the benefit of the doubt must be tempered by the need to maintain rigorous standards. Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life terms; barring misconduct and impeachment, once the Senate confirms them, they face few additional checks throughout their career. Each individual Senator has an obligation to make certain that he or she carefully considers each nominee and votes to confirm only if he or she believes the nominee will be able to fairly and impartially discharge their judicial duties. The courts are the ultimate guarantors of our liberties. We place our trust in them and count on smart, independent, wise judges to apply our laws within the framework of the Constitution.

The Senate has a constitutional obligation to review and, when necessary, serve as a check on the President's choices. That is what I intend to do.

I have urged the President to select a nominee who is in the mainstream of American jurisprudence, who would come to the Court without a divisive pre-determined ideological agenda and would address each case on its own merits. I do not yet know enough about Judge Alito to know whether he meets the criteria I have laid out. I take very seriously my constitutional responsibilities as a Senator to engage in a searching review and consideration of Judge Alito's fitness for this position. Please be assured that I will keep your views in mind as the Senate continues this important confirmation process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. He doesn't know if Alito meets the criteria or not?
Will someone please send a proctologist over to help Lieberman? He appears to have his head stuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like he is keeping his cards close to his chest.
He sounds okay to me right now
I have urged the President to select a nominee who is in the mainstream of American jurisprudence, who would come to the Court without a divisive pre-determined ideological agenda and would address each case on its own merits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Add to the other key democrats: Nelson (D-FL) undecided,
Byrd (D-WV) undecided. I called both their offices today in Washington, suggesting that they should adhere to their party and vote against this nomination.

Who else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Byrd is a Constitutionalist
First and foremost. I don't see him voting for anyone espousing a "unitary executive" theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well, the young woman I spoke with today politely told me that he
was still undecided.

We'll see. He was listed as a KEY vote by the Republicans at their web site (cited this morning on the DU).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. The thing with Byrd is that he loves the filibuster
He's scared to death that Frist will "go nuclear" and destroy it. I'm still hoping that his love of the Constitution will trump his love of Senatorial rules. We'll see, I guess. He's important because he's one of the Gang of Fourteen that can say yea or nay to a judicial filibuster.
The issue for him will be if Alito constitutes "extraordinary circumstances" warranting a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Nelson is undecided???
That's not what I heard. I read that he was the only democrat who was voting to approve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, it's not like Alito's as dangerous as video games.
JoeMentum has very strong views where a real threat to democracy is concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or porn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. ...or Osama Bin Laden
video star! (muffled laugh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. By taking this pose, he hopes to play hard-to-get for the GOPs, so
they give him respect & who knows what else, and head off attacks from the Dems, who know he's really a Bushie ringer. I think he's already decided to vote for Alito (because we know who his bosses really are), but it's still worth trying to sway him to do the right thing. Giving up even on this slimy Bush creature is not an option, the stakes with Alito are too damn high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. They are all waiting to see how strong our reaction will be. Pour it on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. All those words... to say absolutely nothing! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC