WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:39 PM
Original message |
Per Rasmussen: 35% of CT Dems still support Lieberman |
|
Rasmussen officially released the new poll showing a "lively" race for the CT Senate. Lieberman up by five 46-41 over Lamont.
The biggest problem for Lamont is that the poll shows that 35% or slightly more than one-third of the states Democrats still support Lieberman. To win Ned needs to widdle that number down substantially given Lieberman's independent and republican support.
With nearly three months I think that Ned can do it!
www.rasmussenreports.com
|
Demeter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It Won't Hold--They Will See the Error of Their Ways |
|
Some people have higher denial quotas and inertia, but it's an avalanche, and they will move into the light.
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Say no more!!!!!!!!
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-13-06 01:55 PM by WI_DEM
He has Democrats ahead for the Senate in PA, OH, MO, Montana and RI and shows competitive races in Nevada and Tennessee. His polling this election season I think has been fair and even Daily Kos seems to trust it and it backs up most other polls for Senate and Governor races. So, the standard pat "It's Rasmussen" doesn't jell.
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I generally prefer that graph where they place all the pollsters in the mix, and the trend line, minus bias, becomes apparent.
Rasmussen has always gone out of their way to forecast the best GOP case whenever they can pull it out of their asses. I'm loathe to give them "credit" for not gaming the numbers 'this time,' but that's just me, I guess.
But then, perhaps they have a stinky finger in the wind, and they're adjusting their practices to be assured of continued work, in the event that power shifts at long last, and it's Democrats spending money on niche and specified polling?
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. i will never trust Rasmussen" i was polled by them in fla 3 times |
|
before the 2004 election and they were the most skewed and tipped poll questions i have ever experienced..and i was polled all during the 2004 campaign time by Pew several times..and several others..
Rasmussen asked very slanted questions!!..thats when i realized they were nothing but bullshit for little lord pissy pants..
Pew was the most balanced questions!
fly
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. oh and go joe will not have dem clubs behind him nor will he have |
|
dem mailing lists..dem emails going out in his behalf..
this week go joe got all the media..it will die quickly..and he will fade..and Lamont will take center stage with dems..
remember go joe spit in dems faces..he will loose all following quickly i believe..and when big name dems come to Ct to support Lamont..go joe will be gone!
fly
|
katinmn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. Agreed. Rasmussen is a pollster for hire with definate biases |
Jara sang
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
3. If fucking Leiberman fucks this thing up for us. |
|
Mother fucker better not.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Lieberman IS the Republican strategy... |
|
He is the perfect tool for their "cut and run" strategy.
|
Arugula Latte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I'm afraid they're going to install rigged machines by November. |
|
My fear is that Rove will help them rig it for Lieberman -- they can't let their buddy go.
|
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Horrible news for Lieberman, I'd say. Didn't he have 48% one week ago? |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-13-06 01:58 PM by Marr
I mean, 48% of the Democrats. That's one quarter of his Democratic support gone in a week, isn't it?
|
calico1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. 35% isn't all that hot for an 18 year incumbent. |
|
Plus most of the Indies in CT are against the war. I think Lamont has time to make this up and gain Indy support.
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. he already did get alot of indy support ..how many registered |
|
dem for this past weeks election?? very telling!!
fly
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |