jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 11:39 AM
Original message |
Sierra Club yanks Lieberman endorsement |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-16-06 11:39 AM by jsamuel
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. do I have to put the title in all caps and !!!!!!!!! to get a few notices |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. hmm? Did you say something? |
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Poor Joe. But that's what happens to a guy who has a good |
|
environmental record when he carries water for the president with the worst environmental record of the past four decades.
|
Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Good. I'd like to see them support Lamont. |
|
Lamont's platform on the environment is extremely consistant with the Sierra Club.
|
Bumblebee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. they should be encouraged to do so -- but they probably won't. |
ginnyinWI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. why wouldn't they support Lamont? n/t |
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Good for them. Can't support a guy who supports Bush policy. |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Is this the start of the house of cards collapse? Let's hope so. |
warrens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-16-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
See, now he can deny he's a bunnyhugger!!!! It's all turning up roses for Holy Joe. He's got probably another week or so to believe that. Then reality will finally sink in and he'll quit.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message |