radfringe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 08:40 AM
Original message |
agree or disagree on Rummy Resignation Resolution? |
|
using a procedural technicality the vote of no confidence was stopped by repubs.
In the past we've seen the rush to vote by repubs - shouts of NO MORE DEBATE - VOTE NOW, and refusing to even consider amendments etc being offered by DEMs
but yesterday - instead of turning it into some big PR event to "force" the DEMs to vote for/against something - the repubs dug up a procedural technicality which prohibited voting on the resolution.
why? Seems to me the repubs didn't have the votes/support to defeat it, nor did they have any poison pills to add to it.
Are the moderate repubs throwing away their rubberstamps and standing up? (at least between now and the (s)selection)
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message |
|
rummy is an incompetant twit who has been wrong on every key decision he's had to make. He's a danger to this country, our safety and security and to the troops he is supposedly responsible for. He's an incompetant bastard who needs to be chucked out of his position ASAP.
|
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It's not that they may or may not have had the votes. |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 08:44 AM by Vash the Stampede
It's that the individual Senators would've been forced to go on record as to whether or not they support this administration. It could've been absolutely deadly to Republicans heading into an election.
On edit: Whether or not it passes, and however Republicans would've voted, this would've been killer.
|
radfringe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. BTW - did you see Wes Clark yesterday? |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Just said hi to him. It was still really cool. I love working here - this stuff happens all the time. :-)
|
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Be careful what we ask for. |
|
What would be the best way for Bush to kill multiple birds with one political stone? (Killing stuff is always such an apt metaphor when speaking of anything related to Bush). How could Bush at once a)Silence democratic critics; b)Appease the moderates and the DLC; c) Appeal to his war-mongering, faith-based base; d) Provide weeks of non-stop positive coverage for the GOP campaigners and his own legacy, for taking tough action in response to the will of the people, blah blah blah blah...; e) Bitch-slap the Ned Lamont supporters and send a message to other would-be stragglers?
What simple act could hand all of these victories to Bush on one big fat gilded platter?
Meet Joe Lieberman, Secretary of Defense.
(I won't get into the absolutely insane ramifications of appointing an Orthodox Jew to run our military campaign against the Muslims. Nope. I won't.)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message |