oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:45 AM
Original message |
Will Woodward's Book Shake Up Lamont/Lieberman Race? |
|
Is Joe's loyalty to Bush finally going to be his downfall?
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message |
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. "No comment, I haven't had a chance to read the book" Joe will say |
|
while on the campaign trail.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
2. so far the only one who has benefited from Woodward's recent books |
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. This time he may have accidentally given a Dem a boost in the polls. |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. i really hope you're correct. |
Jacobin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
3. The voters who will decide this race don't read books |
|
We know who will vote against Lieberman. We know who will vote for him.
The middle, soft 20% will decide at the last minute based on some stupid campaign ad or slogan
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Connecticutt folks read a teensy bit more than folks in Flyover USA. |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 11:56 AM by oasis
That's the difference.:think:
|
Jacobin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
The 20% in the middle don't read books.
Otherwise, they wouldn't be 'undecided'
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Exactly. I don't have the data, but I'd guess less than 5% of US citizens |
|
would read a book like that.
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. It's not the 5% that read it... |
|
It's the 30-35% that hear about it on the news, or through friends who heard it on the news, or read it in the newspaper, or heard it on talk radio, etc.
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
7. What did the book say about Joe? |
|
Can someone point me to a thread?
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. The book says Bush has misled Americans on Iraq. Bush and Joe |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 12:06 PM by oasis
are joined at the hip. :pals:
Do you really need a link to help you out on that?
|
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
18. Well, no - but I hadn't read any threads about the book |
|
well, about the contents of the books (I've read about Woodward today, though).
But, yes, I don't need a book to tell me about Triangulatin' Joe.
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
13. The GOP is the Party of NEGATIVEISM...everything about them is |
|
NEGATIVE....read the book
VOTE BLUE and reject TORTURE/Lieberman.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Joe's October Marathon. How far and how fast can he run away from Bush? |
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. Too Late for the "RUN".. The pic of him Hugging the President is all |
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Tune in to Larry King tonight for Woodward interview... |
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Thanks for the headsup. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |