Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are the R-Wingers bringing up Barney Frank?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:48 AM
Original message
Why are the R-Wingers bringing up Barney Frank?
Other than the fact that the man is gay, did I miss something he has done in the past that they can point to in order to make their pot look less black?

I don't recall any scandal involving Frank other than he has openly admitted to being homosexual. What gives?:shrug:

Pfft... if all they've got is that he's gay, that just shows how sick THEY are! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sadly, to many right wingers, the fact that Foley is gay...
is worse than the fact that he's a pedophile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Stephen Gobie
He was a hustler who Barney Frank fell in love with while still in the closet. Gobie lived with Frank and was still hustling (unbeknonst to Frank). Frank also fixed parking tickets for Gobie. He was censured by the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ah, OK, now I get it...
Wow, Barney's behavior really was scandalous... and, of course, Gobie was underaged too, right!? :sarcasm::eyes::crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Gobie was in his 20's as I recall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's what I figured...
And I thought Dems were the only ones guilty of moral relativism, right? Hah! (again: :sarcasm:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yes, so scandalous! Unlike some of their other Repuke heroes...
... Like Guiliani and Gingrich, among a score of others. Of course they're straight and Republican so no one cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think they're thinking of ex-rep.......
Gerry Studds who had an affair with a page way back in the 80s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. To the wingers,
being gay is worse than being a child molester. That's the only conclusion I've been able to reach.

A couple of days ago they were discussing it on the Rapture Ready message boards (yes, I've admitted before that I go there for cheap entertainment). Their spin on it was that the Mark Foley situation proves that homosexuality leads to pedophilia. (Using their reasoning, though, you could equally say that heterosexuality leads to pedophilia because more minors are sexually abused by members of the opposite sex than the same sex.) The right-wingers keep going back to the fact that Foley is gay. That's the most important part of it to them, and that's why they're now bringing up Barney Frank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. NO! I don't think they necessarily believe it
But I DO think they'd like very much to turn this into a referendum on "gayness". They WANT to make this issue about him being gay, not about him being a pederast.

If they can make it about sexual orientation, then how are the Dems going to complain?

Just like the Catholic church did with their pedophile and pederast priests -- the GOP wants to make this all about GAY, not about CRIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I think it is an issue now
of grasping at whatever straws are available to "explain" this both to themselves and to the outside. You use whatever tools are in the box that is handy. Doesn't mean that they will work, but that would be the first place to go - finger pointing, gay bashing, rather than looking at the issue of one guy who is screwed up and those that helped to cover up for him. If anything, it will be the LIE that gets them. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Because he's the only admitted gay congrressman, and that's
what they're looking at with Foley.

I will say one thing in quasi defense of some of the Pubs on this one. The emails that have been made public on TV were not terribly incriminating to Foley. Although I suspected more, even I didn't realize how rotten this guy was until I read the IM on the ABC site yesterday! I understand why the media doesn't want to put these IM's on your TV, but without the info in them, I think a lot of people just don't realize how disgusting Foley really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's also a diversion tactic
"Don't look here; look there."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. being gay is a crime and a sin y'know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. Freeps are desperately trying to find an excuse
that will justify 'publicans who pederast.

And in doing so, prove to the world what
complete dumbshits and weasels they are.

Is there any way we can encourage them to keep digging?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. When caught and looking like a criminal, demonetize the other side.
It really is funny how clueless they are that this Foley "alleged" crime shows him to be a gay predator. Their disconnect is funny to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. I had a hunch they would bring up Barney Frank so I posted the following
last night.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2857136&mesg_id=2857136

Here's how to curtail another GOP Talking Point.

Note how the GOP supporters quicky and deftly attempt to shift the blame away from Foley and the failures of the Republican House Leadership and try to make this a bi-partisan scandal.
Facts about Barney Frank. Yes, he was involved in sex scandal with A 28 year old male prostitute in 1990, but when the then Democratic Leadership found out about it, they took immediate action. They tried to expel him, censure him, and finally succeeded in reprimanding him (they feared he would lose his seat). Instead, he won re-election with 66% of the vote and bigger margins since then. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_Frank
Compare this with the Foley case and the failures of the Republican majority to act on information given to them more than a year ago. Foley (Maf52) was asking a 16 year old male page to describe how he masterbates ! Worse still is the inaction by the House Leadership. They did nothing and allowed this man to continue to be the head of the NCMEC Caucus and of all things run for re-election. And now a year later when this bombshell comes out, they finally start harping about pursuing a criminal investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. 'Cause that's all they got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. A large portion of them
believe:

gay = pedofile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, it's like having measles and blue eyes at the same time.
It happens, but one doesn't necessarily go with the other.
Most pedophiles are not gay.
Most gays are not pedophiles.

Frank's association with a "young" male prostitute was quite a bombshell at the time.
Repugs like to bring it up, but no minors were involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. "Most pedophiles are not gay. Most gays are not pedophiles."
Wow, this needs to become a Major Meme! Excellent truism. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC