Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Did the President Know and When Did He Know It?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 12:51 PM
Original message
What Did the President Know and When Did He Know It?
Edited on Wed Oct-04-06 01:05 PM by Stephanie


I find it hard to believe young George was not told the reason for his hastily planned, extra-long vacation. I think it's curious he refused to talk to Woodward this time. I'd like to know who Isikoff's source is for the 2003 article below which claims Bush was briefed. If Rice knew, Bush knew, I'm betting.





http://www.msnbc.com/news/907379.asp?0cv=KA01
The Secrets of September 11
The White House is battling to keep a report on the terror attacks secret. Does the 2004 election have anything to do with it?
April 30, 2003

<snip>

Some sources who have read the still-secret congressional report say some sections would not play quite so neatly into White House plans. One portion deals extensively with the stream of U.S. intelligence-agency reports in the summer of 2001 suggesting that Al Qaeda was planning an upcoming attack against the United States—and implicitly raises questions about how Bush and his top aides responded. One such CIA briefing, in July 2001, was particularly chilling and prophetic. It predicted that Osama bin Laden was about to launch a terrorist strike “in the coming weeks,” the congressional investigators found. The intelligence briefing went on to say: “The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning.”

The substance of that intelligence report was first disclosed at a public hearing last September by staff director Hill. But at the last minute, Hill was blocked from saying precisely who within the Bush White House got the briefing when CIA director Tenet classified the names of the recipients. (One source says the recipients of the briefing included Bush himself.) As a result, Hill was only able to say the briefing was given to “senior government officials.”





http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A15957-2001Aug29¬Found=true
Summer Spinning
To GOP, Vacation Boosted Bush Agenda; To Democrats, Voters See a Shirk Ethic
Aug 29

<snip>

The White House had announced that Bush would stay at his 1,600-acre ranch in Crawford from Aug. 4 through Labor Day on Sept. 3, a 31-day stretch that would have broken a modern record for a presidential vacation, held by Richard M. Nixon for a 30-day trip to San Clemente, Calif., in 1969. News reports played up the record, and a Gallup Poll found that 55 percent of respondents thought Bush's vacation was too long.

The length of the trip revived old questions about Bush's work ethic, and the poll and the news coverage caused consternation in the White House. Aides said they had planned an ambitious schedule for Bush as long ago as late June, but reporters were not told about it, even after they landed here. The White House, suddenly defensive, took every opportunity to show Bush on the go and even created a "Western White House" logo for the briefing room at Crawford Elementary School. Bush revealed that his ranch had new video conferencing equipment for keeping in touch with his national security team.






http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/02/washington/03ricecnd.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Rice Received Qaeda Warning Before 9/11
By PHILIP SHENON
Published: October 2, 2006

JIDDA, Saudi Arabia, Oct. 2 — A review of White House records has determined that George J. Tenet, then the director of central intelligence, did indeed brief Condoleezza Rice and other top officials on July 10, 2001 about looming threat from Al Qaeda, a State Department spokesman said on Monday evening.

The account by the spokesman, Sean McCormack, came hours after Ms. Rice, the secretary of state, told reporters aboard her airplane that she did not recall such a meeting and said it was “incomprehensible” she ignored dire terrorist threats two months before the Sept. 11 attacks. Mr. McCormack also said the Bush administration had determined that the Sept. 11 commission had been briefed about the meeting, even though no mention of it appears in the commission’s report.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES
This is the type of question that needs to be asked over and over!!!!!! You know damn well that Bush knew! They were shielding their ears and biding time. They seriously wanted a major event to happen in the USA!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't hear anyone asking it
All I hear them asking is whether it's okay for a 50-year-old to molest a 16-year-old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Actually a lot of DUers have been connecting the dots Stephanie...
and looking at the fourth point raised in your thread from 8-6-2003, as well as other valid points.

"Connect the Dots, America!"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=133055#top

Thanks again to you and all other truthseekers!

Bob

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. thank you!
where did you ever dig that one up? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Like you and others I save what is worth saving! The dots lead to other
dots-and the dots represent the history and networks of criminals and corruption and what they've tried to hide.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why did they allow it to happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wow. That stupid "Western White House" emblem was a quick stunt
to legitimize Bush's French-style month-long vacation. Where he heard the same "10 on a scale of 10" warnings.

Evacuate the lowlands, cuz here comes the flood. My guess: Bush brushed off the "slide show" with a joke.

The August 6 PDB will now come under much closer scrutiny, and Bush and Cheney's testimony to the 9/11 Commission will come into question.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Congress should be asking many questions about all this.....will they?
Will Congress do its' job....for once?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC