Nobody pulls gay IM "pranks" alone in their room in their underwear

[Proud2BAmurkin]

then shows them to their buddies days later. If you do it you do it in front of your buddies or you send them the IMs while they're online and while they're happening.

And the "prank" page source now says the page is ADAMANT he's not gay.

Would someone so ADAMANT about NOT being gay sit in his room alone and pull a gay prank with a pedophile rePUKE?

I'm guessing a homophobic rePUKE teenager who got sucked into a conversation with a pedophile rePUKE and had buyers remorse later would probably claim it was a prank.

[Rex]

1. Well, we all know Foley 'pulled' on his wanker before voting.

E W W W! How many hands did he shake that day, how many babies did he kiss? :puke:

[gully]

2. It's not relevant whether or not it was a prank on the part of the kid.

Foley engaged in the behavior he did, regardless.

[Fleshdancer]

4. exactly

When NBC baits pedophiles online, the men aren't really talking to 14 yr old kids. They think they are and they attempt to engage in illegal and harmful behavior. Would we say their actions are ok since they really weren't talking to kids in the first place? No.

The sexual orientation of the page doesn't matter. It doesn't excuse Foley's actions. He knows it, we know it and the pages know it. The republicans need to wake up and stop trying to excuse Foley's actions.

[uppityperson]

3. sexual orientation of the page is irrelevant!

what is relavant is what foley did. Or is your point this might be why the page told?