Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Raises Religion in Court Race, Calling Democrat an Atheist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 11:38 AM
Original message
GOP Raises Religion in Court Race, Calling Democrat an Atheist
GOP Raises Religion in Court Race, Calling Democrat an Atheist
Mary Alice Robbins
Texas Lawyer
10-09-2006

Religion has entered the political fray in a race for an appellate court bench in east Texas. The Austin-based Republican Party of Texas played the religion card in a Sept. 21 online newsletter. As alleged in the newsletter, Texarkana solo E. Ben Franks, Democratic nominee for a seat on the 6th Court of Appeals, "is reported to be a professed atheist" and apparently believes the Bible is a "collection of myths.'"

But Franks says he has never professed to be an atheist and is not a member of any atheist organization. Franks says no one with the Republican Party ever asked him whether he professes to be an atheist. However, he says he's not surprised by the allegation... Anthony Champagne, a political science professor at the University of Texas at Dallas, says he has watched judicial races in Texas and other parts of the country for 25 years and has never before seen a judicial candidate accused of being an atheist. "I've never seen the religious issue pushed that hard," Champagne says...

The Republican Party's allegation that Franks is an atheist stems from a June 18, 2002, article published in the El Paso Times, after the Texas Democratic Party held its state convention in the far west Texas city. As noted in the article, Democrats on the party's platform committee debated whether to drop "God" from a sentence on the first page of the committee's platform report that read: "We want a Texas where all people can fulfill their dreams and achieve their God-given potential." The article quotes Franks, a member of the platform committee, as saying, "I'm an atheist, this does not bother me. I'm a pragmatist." Franks says the article misquoted him and what he said was, "Let's say I'm an atheist. I still have no problem with this platform, because I'm a pragmatist." What he was saying, Franks says, is that, if he were an atheist, he would not be offended by the reference to God in the platform.

Jeff Fisher, the state Republican Party's executive director, says "some people who know Franks" -- people whom Fisher did not identify -- have told him that Franks professes to be an atheist. Fisher says the GOP sent the newsletter to people who subscribe to the party's e-mail publications to inform them about Franks. "We have a candidate running for the 6th Court who clearly shows he's out of touch with the people," he says...

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1160125527178
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. But being an atheist is a good thing. What's the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Well...if he's not an atheist, people shouldn't be calling him one.
There are plenty of "good things" (as well as bad things) that I am not, and I would correct people who called me those things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. You missed the point....
If someone is an Atheist they are people (Especially in East Texas where this election is taking place) that will NOT vote for him on that grounds alone. On the other hand, most Agnostics and Atheists (and many other people) will NOT vote for the alleged Atheist just because he is an Atheist (i.e. they will look at the person's entire record and decide on the entire record and dismiss the Candidate's Atheism as unimportant). This is why such an accusation is effective, it turns some voters AWAY from a Candidate, but almost no voters to the Candidate (Especially in East Texas, which is the Furtherest point of the American South).

In many ways calling someone an Atheist in the American South today is like called someone "Colored" in the South of the 1920 through the 1950s. In the all white Primaries of the time period being called "Colored" meant a solid minority of Voters will vote against you and since the Blacks could NOT vote in those Primaries you gained no votes by being called "Colored". Thus if you could call your opponent "Colored" it was the kiss of Death of ever getting elected (and the same with Atheism in that part of the US, it is the Kiss of Death of ever getting elected for you will have a solid majority of people who will vote against you because they believe you are an Atheist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. In America, an atheist can't get elected dogcatcher.
In America, a country where all creeds (including no creed) are
considered equal, an atheist can't get elected dogcatcher.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. George H. W. Bush said he's not sure that atheists can be...
...US citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. FILE A BI G FAT LIBEL/slander suit, stat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. hmmmm 1. he's an atheist 2. say people "who know franks"
there's your two GOP campaign bellwethers: religion and heresay.

Just lovely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. HMS George H W Bush
When George Bush was campaigning for the presidency, as incumbent vice-president, one of his stops was in Chicago, Illinois, on August 27, 1987. At O'Hare Airport he held a formal outdoor news conference. There Robert I. Sherman, a reporter for the American Atheist news journal, fully accredited by the state of Illinois and by invitation a participating member of the press corps covering the national candidates, had the following exchange with then-Vice-President Bush.


Sherman: What will you do to win the votes of the Americans who are atheists?

Bush: I guess I'm pretty weak in the atheist community. Faith in God is important to me.

Sherman: Surely you recognize the equal citizenship and patriotism of Americans who are atheists?

Bush: No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.

Sherman (somewhat taken aback): Do you support as a sound constitutional principle the separation of state and church?

Bush: Yes, I support the separation of church and state. I'm just not very high on atheists.


WOW..I never knew about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. WOW, this is one of those things
that I had never heard. Every time this fucker opens his mouth, I learn to hate him more.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. KKKarl is a Self-Described Agnostic
KKKarl Rove, the architect of "God, Guns, and Gays":

1. is a self-described agnostic;

2. dodged the draft to avoid picking up a gun in service his country; and

3. was raised by a gay man, according to the new book, The Architect:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=the+architect+karl+rove+father

So, next time this snake oil salesman tries to peddle his message to the "heartland," be sure to call him out on all three.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Is Karl gay? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Dunno, But...
... he is once-divorced, twice-married, and has a son who is of military service age.

I guess the "sanctity of marriage" doesn't apply where Rove is concerned, and I guess dodging military service is the dominant gene in his gene pool.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Being an Atheist is t a good thing
The Republican Candidate is using this attack as a weapon.
Polls reflect that an atheist could not be elected in the U.S.

The Culture War is often described as the struggle in
the U.S. between Christians and Secularists. How often
we see Democrats described as 'Godless".

In this case the Repub. is going for the jugular.
No matter how we feel about Atheism --the average Joe
often sees this as something bad. Marginalise, Marginalise
marginalise the opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. AL pols on both sides trying to "Out-Jesus" each other.
disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC