Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:54 PM
Original message |
Goddamn!!!! A liberal on Katie's Free Speech! |
|
Katrina Vanden Huevel!!!:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :applause: :applause: :applause:
|
Nite Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. And she is usually good |
Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Pretty good. Talked reasonably about getting out of Iraq. |
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. What's her ratio been of cons to liberals. |
|
I can't stand to watch her, so I don't know. I did hear about her turning down Maher for "free speech" because they didn't approve of what had to say. :eyes:
|
Nictuku
(907 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'll watch it for Katrina!! |
|
I've yet to watch CBS w/Katie. I respect Cronkite, Shieffer, and Rather too much. But I've set my DVR to record it. Then I can fast foward to Katrina. She rocks! I would love to see a huge BUMP in ratings when they have someone in the 'Free Speach Zone' who is willing to speak Truth to Power.
Can't wait to see it! (PST)
|
Nictuku
(907 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Lets try to get this to Greatest |
|
... so more west coasters can try and catch it.
|
Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. I don't watch her either, but |
|
I just happened to be walking to the kitchen to get another burger, and the wife was channel surfing, and I heard "Katrina Vanden Heuvel".
Had to listen.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Apparently the ratio is now equal to the number of cons they've had. |
mark414
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
12. it was because he wanted to talk about religion |
|
which was no deal...they said they'd send bill a list of "acceptable topics"
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. "acceptable topics" for "free speech". |
otohara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Breaking News - CBS Allows Liberal |
|
to talk on behalf of 60% of the country.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Yah right. Damn posters from The Onion. |
Nictuku
(907 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Is this a prank? (n/t) |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. lol! I was just being snarky at Katie. |
peekaloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
14. She didn't froth at the mouth and was rather soft spoken and to the point. |
|
:D
Of course Katie promised "another viewpoint" tomorrow night from an "actual Marine".
|
sandyd921
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I'm shocked! A real liberal! |
|
I listen to Katrina Vanden Heuvel on Laura Flanders (also I'm a subscriber to the Nation). So when's she having Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn on?
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message |
16. My non-bashing e-ltr to Katie/CBS (last week) |
|
I am not a Katie-basher. This is just advice:
SIT DOWN behind the blankety-blank DESK!!1 and READ the blankety-blank TelePrompter!!!111
Also, part of the BIG TIME ANCHOR deal-lie is to DO some personal REPORTING, like Peter, over at the Green Zone, or in a BURKA/trenchcoat!!!!!!!1
Does it take some 5 figure salary for ME to give you this blankety blank advice FOR FREE????????
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message |