texasleo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-11-06 01:45 AM
Original message |
If 9-11-2001 had been 10-11-2006, it would still be Clinton's fault |
|
make no mistake, friends. John McCain showed us earlier this day that there is no statute of limitations for "responsibility."
After the dust had settled, assuming they would have waited that long, the accusations would begin. Then, there would be a debate on who was more responsible.
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-11-06 01:47 AM
Response to Original message |
NMMNG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-11-06 01:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Because Clinton got a BJ.
But if it happened on 1/20/09 during the inauguration of the Democratic president nobody would dare blame it on Chimpy.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 03:20 AM
Response to Original message |