Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq: Divide and Rule, 'Ethnic Cleansing Works'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:49 PM
Original message
Iraq: Divide and Rule, 'Ethnic Cleansing Works'

Iraq: Divide and Rule, 'Ethnic Cleansing Works'


By Enver Masud

The Milli Gazette Online

Polls by the State Department and independent researchers show that Iraqis favor an immediate U.S. pullout, meanwhile, an "independent commission", according to the Sunday Times, "may recommend carving up Iraq into three highly autonomous regions".

We believe that the commission's recommendation will have little to do with the welfare of the Iraqis. Their recommendations will have much to do with expanding U.S. control of the energy resources of the Middle East and Central Asia.

In a letter to President Clinton in 1998, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) -- the global domination project of the neoconservatives -- urged him to remove Saddam Hussein from power in order to secure "our vital interests in the Gulf" that holds "a significant portion of the world's supply of oil." This probably wouldn't happen, they said, unless "some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor" took place.

September 11, 2001 became the new Pearl Harbor.

The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, issued by the Bush administration in September 2002, said: "The events of September 11, 2001, opened vast, new opportunities." But the decision to invade Iraq had been made much earlier.

More: http://www.milligazette.com/dailyupdate/2006/20061014_Iraq_war_ethnic_cleansing.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly. The idea that BushCo didn't foresee this violence is bollocks.
It was predicted by many, here and elsewhere, before Bush** invaded Iraq, no degree or creative imagination required. His own father knew what the result of overthrowing Hussein would be -- and so stopped short of that -- during the first Gulf War.

This was intentional. The lack of adequate troops to secure the country and streets, the false flag ops to stir up tensions...BushCo have merely got exactly what they wanted so far. And they're going to mine the situation for every last bloody $ they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC