Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LaHood Admits He Was ‘Playing Politics’ (Intel Staffer Suspension)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 09:28 PM
Original message
LaHood Admits He Was ‘Playing Politics’ (Intel Staffer Suspension)
LaHood Admits He Was ‘Playing Politics’ When He Asked For Intel Staffer To Be Suspended


This week, on the request of Rep. Ray LaHood (R-IL), Intelligence Chairman Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) suspended a Democratic staffer’s access to classified information. Hoekstra said the suspension would remain in place pending a review to determine if that staffer leaked a classified National Intelligence Estimate to the New York Times.

Today on Fox News, LaHood said, “I’ll tell you why I did it. The reason I did it was because Jane Harman released the Duke Cunningham — who sat on our Intelligence committee — report.” That report, which detailed the misconduct of Cunningham, who is now serving a jail term, was not classified.

A Fox anchor asked, “So, it’s payback?” LaHood responded, “There are some of us on the other side who can equally play politics, and I’m not afraid to do it.” Watch it: Watch it:

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/20/lahood-intelligence-suspended/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMFG! All these freepers I debate have had a newsgasm over this!
Wait until I see their reaction!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait a second...
Edited on Fri Oct-20-06 09:39 PM by originalpckelly
he is saying he released his letter for political purposes, he isn't saying he wrote it for political purposes. This isn't any good.

Update: Or maybe he is, I think I am confused here. It isn't clear, that woman should have asked him if he wrote the letter for political purposes or leaked the letter for political purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. He accuses a staffer of possible
treason or other crimes and it's "just" politics? What if the tables party wise had been turned? I think LaHood should be facing some charges himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC