Bunny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:29 PM
Original message |
So, did you hear that Candy Crowley is FAT? And UGLY? |
|
I wasn't sure if the message had gotten through yet. I mean, there's only five Candy threads on the first page of GD. I don't think a single one of them fails to mention her appearance, but you can never be too sure. This has been your public service message for today. :eyes:
|
AndyA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. You know, I guess I never really thought about it before, but you're right. |
|
If she gets any bigger, she'll only fit on W I D E S C R E E N sets! :rofl:
|
filer
(444 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot! |
|
Just figured this page could use some balance.
|
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I hear Candy and Rush are going to do a porno film together |
|
and use it to torture the "enemy combatants" at Gitmo. This is contingent on Rush getting enough viagra and enough flour to dust Candy and locate the wet spot.
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. OK-that made me laugh... |
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. Combining Rush, viagra and the punch line of an old joke about |
|
ultra plus size women is pretty much a guarantee of a laugh.
|
Elidor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. Heard it direct from the "porno guy" in the RNC anti-Ford ad. |
|
There will be a trailer for the "call me" chick's new skin flick in it too.
|
Tom Yossarian Joad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
partylessinOhio
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Did you notice that Katie Couric looks awful tonight. |
|
The face, the fierce look, the hair is flat and stringy, the white blouse is too tight and one collar point is folding inward. She should fire her stylist and her plastic surgeon.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Who is doing her eye makeup, a racoon? |
|
Is this supposed to be some "gravitas" makeover?
|
TroglodyteScholar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
6. A breath of fresh air... |
|
First, I'll say that I'm a guy. Now on to the point.
I was actually pleased the first time I saw Crowley on the TV. Not because I like big girls...and not because I like her as a person. I was pleased because a news channel finally got the BALLS to have a female presenter who couldn't also make a living as a model. How can open-minded and sensitive lefties talk shit about this woman's looks? Aren't we the same people who always criticize the unrealistic portrayal of females (aka sextoys) in media? Isn't nice to have a face on TV that looks even remotely like one you might see at the grocery store?
I'm all for firing all the news models (male, female, and robot) and replacing them with real people.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Beauty is only skin deep |
|
... but Candy's ugliness goes clear to the bone.
|
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:blush: The poor dear... :eyes:
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I think the message of the OP went over a lot of peoples' heads. n/t |
Bunny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Shhh - don't tell them that! |
|
It interferes with their fun. :eyes:
|
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Um, I thought I got it. |
|
Maybe I wasn't clever enough? :shrug:
|
Bunny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. You did. A few others did too. |
|
Some did not, and that was pretty predictable.
|
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
(I'm also overweight and not the prettiest in the class but I'm not so bothered by it) :shrug:
|
Sugar Smack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
Bunny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
12. there are so many things to criticize about her that are not appearance |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I 'm Medieval that way: the outside reflects the inner self. |
|
The Republicans are all Pardoners and Summoners.
|
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
19. I just saw her introduction to her show tonight titled "Two Left Feet" |
|
I don't know if she is fat and ugly but she is definitely a BITCH.
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-24-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
24. The other day I was flamed by two DUers objecting to a "fat" joke I never made |
|
I've been calling Matt PUDGE "Matt PUDGE" for a year or two. The association of "pudge" (a word that does not exist) with WEIGHT ********NEVER******* crossed my mind. Yet the original person who was VOCIFEROUS in objecting appartently thought "PUDGE" is related to or derived from "pudgy." Yet here is a whole thread on the same theme as my flamers swimming right along.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |