bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 08:41 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Are you a moderate or a radical? |
|
Just a question - do you see yourself as a Moderate or a radical or somewhere in between. Just respond with your gut feeling. Bryant Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
1. "What kind of system do you have here?" |
|
"Is it an anarchy" "Oh, no; it's nothing as well organized at that"
|
WoodrowFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I thought we were an autonomous collective. (NT) |
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Why Don't You Define Your Terms? |
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Because my curiousity is more about perception of those terms |
|
Than the terms themselves.
Bryant
|
omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
23. Bullshit. This does NOTHING to clarify the perception of those terms |
OffWithTheirHeads
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Hey, my family nickname is "comrade". That's what my |
|
family calls me. So, do you think, maybe, I'm a moderate? Check this out, I belong to the A.C.L.U. AND the N.R.A. Go figure!
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
6. "Moderation in principle is always a vice." Tom Paine |
|
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." Tom Paine
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. That's an interesting statement |
|
I would agree that supporting principles because they are moderate is a mugs game. Doing anything to get approval or to be one of the herd is stupid (although understandable and I suspect we all do it from time to time).
On the other hand you take a list of positions from radical conservative to radical liberal and some of those positions are going to be in the middle - i.e. they are going to be moderate positions. Like say some versions of Fair Trade might be seen as a solid compromise between isolationism and unregulated free trade - i.e. they are the moderate position - but you can think that Fair Trade is a good idea, not because it is moderate, but because it's a good idea.
Bryant
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Being for the 8 hour workday was once "radical". |
|
So, was being against slavery, women's suffrage, public education, Social Security, Civil Rights for blacks, etc, etc, etc.
The "moderates" on all those issues fought tooth and nail against the "dangerous", "untenable", "unworkable", radical ideas that are now considered "moderate".
Hell, what could be considered more "radical" in 1776 than declaring independence from the strongest military power in the world? A position held by a minority of the citizens of this country and much decried by the "moderates" who sat on the sidelenes and finally started proclaiming their "patriotism" after Yorktown.
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. So you would advocate radicalism simply because it is radical? |
|
Certainly one could make a list of bad ideas that were radical as well - like Stalin's ideas, for example.
Bryant
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. As an Anarchist, I choose to make my own decisions. |
|
Here's another thought by another "radical" with which I fully concur:
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever, in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else, where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all." --Thomas Jefferson to Francis Hopkinson, 1789.
What, I believe, both Tom's are saying is that beliefs are our's. That, in the final analysis, we are each responsible for what it is that we find moral and right. Then, it is up to us to live up to those principles or "compromise" them.
I give you as an example, the recent votes on torture and habeus corpus. Some politicians took a "moderate" position and spoke of an "acceptable compromise" and voted for the bill. I find it hard to believe that those prisoners being tortured found the "compromise" by the "moderates" acceptable. Neither do I.
Stalin, and a whole slew of other "leaders" were able to impose themselves and their murderous policies only because the populace were willing to sacrifice the "radicals" who opposed them. Hitler went after the "dangerous radicals" before he went after the Jews, and most "moderate" Germans cheered him on. It was a small step to go after the Jews by labeling them "Jewish Bolshevists".
In the end, in my opinion, it is up to each of us what we will tolerate and which principles we will live by.
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. I would agree with that |
|
up to a point. Everybody should make up their own mind about the best approach or the best solution or the best principles on which to base action. Bryant Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
|
omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
24. Actually, TyL showed the need for clarification & the mutability of those terms |
|
and you intentionally missed the point with a :evilfrown:'s Advocate response.
And retreat back to the ambivalence you started with:
"Everybody should make up their own mind about the best approach or the best solution or the best principles on which to base action."
That must be why you see no need to define the terms-- it's a free for all anyway, what the hell!!
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. I apologize if I've offended you |
|
I am a moderate, myself, in most definitions of the term, so naturally I am going to disagree with some of you.
Bryant
|
omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. No offense taken, it's the wishywashyness that's annoying |
|
"in most definitions of the term" which you don't define and either assume everyone thinks the same about or don't really care
or you know the terms and the poll are ambiguous and enjoy watching people twist in the wind
or understanding what TierrayLibertad said is just too much work...........................................
ambivalence is so much more cozy :boring:
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
30. I understand what he said I just don't entirely agree with it |
|
Or I'm not sure how those words can be used.
As for the ambiguity of the poll it was formed in my head in response to an article by Ben Shapiro, Kid Republican, who wrote an article saying that the Bush Republicans were the center of the country (or even a little center left). I commented that that was more of a function of where Ben Shapiro is, rather than an accurate statement about President Bush's position (on any reasonable scale, President Bush has governed like a far right extremist).
Bryant
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Can I be a moderate radical? |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-01-06 09:31 AM by WilliamPitt
I want to overthrow the government...
...and replace it with a government.
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
10. I consider myself a progressive alternativist.... |
|
Always looking for a better solution.
|
The2ndWheel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Radical when it comes to the environment |
|
Which I suppose would lead to being radical in all other aspects as well, at my gut level at least. I'm talking Kirkpatrick Sale type environmentalism. Human scale communities and all that.
|
Jed Dilligan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It's like asking: are you a certified public accountant, or a shithead?
|
Sammy Pepys
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Not that I split down the middle per se, but I think compromise is an inevitable part of politics and that you're going to have to temper yourself in some areas at certain points in time to progress in others.
|
peekaloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
17. If my views make me appear to be a libertarian socialist or anarchist to others, then... |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-01-06 09:56 AM by Selatius
am I a radical?
If believing in a radically democratic society where the people control the resources and the people determine the course of history instead of a select few monopoly capitalists, then I would proudly wear the badge of "radical."
It is not radical ideas with which I have a problem. It is intolerance with which I have a problem.
|
Fleshdancer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
18. I was considered a moderate in 2000.... |
|
six years later I would probably be labeled as a radical. My political beliefs haven't changed though. I had no idea the country could get this crazy in such a short amount of time.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Define moderate, radical, and the intent. |
StellaBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
21. I consider myself a libertarian socialist... with an anarchist soul... |
hexola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |
27. Depends on who Im talking too! (nt) hehe... |
ithinkmyliverhurts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |
28. Radically moderate? Moderately radical? |
texasleo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-01-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:25 AM
Response to Original message |