Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats want the terrorists to win?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Hulsey13 Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:23 PM
Original message
Democrats want the terrorists to win?
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 05:30 PM by Hulsey13
What the hell is wrong with this President and his merry band of idiots? No matter how many times it is explained to them, they still don't get it. They can continue to accuse Democrats of being soft on terrorists. They can mischaracterize the things that Democrats say. They can continue to distort the truth. But they still won't be right.

Let's go through the charges one at a time, shall we?

"When it comes to trying terrorists, what's the Democrats answer? Just say no."
- George Bush
Trying terrorists? Actually, Democrats completely support trials for accused terrorists. But it was the Bush administration who imprisoned and tortured US citizen Jose Padilla, denying him his rights of due process and protection under the law. And the only reason this man is receiving a trial is because the US Supreme Court ruled that he was entitled to one. Make no mistake - if the man is convicted of plotting terrorist activities in this country, then he should be imprisoned for life in an isolated, remote cell. But he is an American citizen and is entitled to a trial by jury. That is the Democratic position.
"When it came time to vote on whether the NSA should continue to monitor terrorist communications through the Terrorist Surveillance Program, almost 90 percent of the House Democrats voted against it."
- George Bush
No, they didn't. They voted against a bill that would allow the government to spy on its own citizens without a court order. And don't give me the "we need to be able to move immediately, not wait on a court order" crap. Because the FISA legislation allows for the monitoring agency to request a warrant up to 3 days after the contact is intercepted. There is no reason to bypass the FISA courts. In fact, the FISA court approved nearly every warrant requested.
"When it comes to questioning terrorists, what's the Democrat answer? Just say no."
- George Bush
Democrats are not opposed to questioning terrorists. Democrats are opposed to torturing suspects. And we oppose it for two reasons. One, because it is inhumane. It is, in fact, the very lowest of human behavior. For this country to rely on torture as a weapon in a war against terrorists is to become the terrorists ourselves. Two, we oppose it because it does not work. A tortured suspect will say and do anything to make the abuse stop. The intelligence gathered as a result of torture is suspect at best and most often useless.
"However they put it, the Democrats' approach in Iraq comes down to this: The terrorists win and America loses."
- George Bush
Is he even serious? The accusation here is that the Democrats support the terrorists over our own nation. And this coming from an administration that has given us an Iraq policy that is actually fueling the global war on terror. Democrats do not want the terrorists to win. That is absurd. What Democrats want is an intelligent, comprehensive, effective plan to fight the global war on terror. That means more than just "stay the course" in Iraq, or whatever the administration's phrase-du-jour is.
I understand that there are terrorists in the world who wish harm to me, my family, and my country. I know that. But what is required is more than flippant comments, reckless bravado, and the facade of compentence. I hear over and over that our nation is fighting a war unlike any we have ever faced. True. But, as a Marine Corps veteran, I can't help but think that, had Bush and his closest advisors ever experienced actual combat, they might be handling this current fight quite differently.

The bottom line? The Republicans can say that Democrats propose a different solution to the Iraq problem and a different strategy for fighting the war on terror. They can even say that their plans are superior, though to do so with a straight face would require more denial than I can imagine. But what they cannot say is that Democrats want the terrorists to win.

What Democrats want is to make this nation truly safe. What we do not want is to just pretend to do it, at the cost of liberty, freedom, and security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. !
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulsey13 Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. And...
I should add that there are FAR too many examples to list them all. These are just the most current of the "crap" coming from the neo-cons about the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bravo!
And welcome to DU!

:applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. If John Kerry can be lambasted for leaving the"us"
out of a joke denigrating El Chimpo, it is only fair that Bush should apologize to all Democrats for equating them with the foreign terrorists.

We (as Dems) are just as much Americans as the wingnuts on the other side of the political spectrum,and for him to claim "Americanism" only for those who agree with him is an out and out travesty.

So come on, George. Where's my f***ing apology!!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. HEY NOW! George is a "Uniter, not a Divider"! And he is the "Decider"!
:evilgrin: He can "decide" to call us DemocRats terra-ists! It's his Gawd given right, ya know? :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Gawd
has to be more careful, in future, on who he picks for friends!

:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick & Recommend Number 5 for the Greatest page
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. And the terrorists want the Democrats to win?
Who gets to go to be the ultimate winner, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. If you could imagine a Fantasy Land where it were possible to ....
split the United States in half and register one half to the Republicans and the other side to the Democrats, It wouldn't be 6 months before just about every Repug alive would be crying, pleading and begging to live on the Democrat side.

(since their side would be falling apart, No Health-care, No community support, Mandatory Church Worship...no money for police and fire services and the rise of the return to "Company Stores" and the repeal of that disgusting "Minimum Wage" Crap)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Semper Fi Hulsey!
:patriot: and welcome to D.U.:hi: all the bullshit about the Democrats wanting the terrorists to win is the Republic Party straw man argument, because the neocon strategy, if one can call it that is intellectually and morally bankrupt with an end result of only multiplying the terrorist's numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetpotato Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. This should be an e-mail forward!
Only its true and not "glurgy" enough. But spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulsey13 Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. How could I forget "some say we are not at war"?
How could I forget the comments last week? He trotted out not just one but TWO straw men. First, he said, "there are some here in Washington who say we aren't at war." And then, in Sugardland, Texas, he said, "some say that they wouldn't spend another dime on the troops in Iraq."

Are you kidding me? Who the hell says we aren't at war? Anyone? Anyone? And not spending another dime on the troops? Hardly. Planning to redeploy troops to a more effective use is not the same as bankrupting the military.

Idiots. All of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent post! k&r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoil tiaras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. We just love those terrists...
After all, if the godly Freepers say it, then it MUST be true... :eyes: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC