Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Entire Third Division may go back to Iraq (20,000 soldiers for 3rd tour)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 11:58 AM
Original message
Entire Third Division may go back to Iraq (20,000 soldiers for 3rd tour)
Entire Third Division may go back to Iraq
Sean Harder

FORT STEWART - Most of the 3rd Infantry Division's 20,000 soldiers likely will return for a third combat tour in Iraq in 2007, the division's commander said Tuesday.

"Given today's conditions, by next fall the division will be back in Iraq," said Maj. Gen. Rick Lynch during a luncheon briefing with local reporters.

Unlike its previous two combat tours, however, the Army division will not deploy all at once. Its four combat brigades, now designed as independent fighting units, will go separately and be plugged into existing command structures wherever they are needed in Iraq.

About 4,000 soldiers with the 1st Brigade Combat Team already have orders to begin a yearlong deployment in mid January. Lynch declined to say where the brigade will operate in Iraq.

The 3rd Brigade, based at Fort Benning in Columbus, would be next to deploy, possibly as early as spring.

(more)

http://new.savannahnow.com/node/170248





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. No need to increase troop levels or have a draft
because we'll just keep using the same people over and over. And I do mean "use". Support the troops my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Read the whole article
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 01:29 PM by Zodiak Ironfist
That two-star general repeated the BushCo line that the Iraqis are killng Americans to influence our elections. Cute that the general decided to spout a political point as his men are going to be sent into the meatgrinder all over again.

Listen to the language

"Lynch repeated a claim made by Vice President Dick Cheney on Monday that increasing violence in Iraq is intended to influence the outcome of next week's midterm elections in which Republicans are struggling to keep control of Congress.

As of Tuesday, there were 103 U.S. service members killed in Iraq, making October the deadliest month for American forces since January of 2005.

"I believe that's what is happening," Lynch said. "The reason we're seeing increased fatalities is not because he (the enemy) is becoming more effective, or has more resources. He just chose now to concentrate ... to try to influence the elections.

"I'm not sure they care whether it's a Democrat-controlled Congress or a Republican Congress, they just want the American people to say 'enough is enough' and, as a result, all the soldiers come home."


In my opinion, the General's statements are incredibly disrespectful of the American people and the soldiers under his command. For one, his job is to follow orders and make tactical decisions, not make political points (notice how he forgot the "ic" in Democratic). Second, I think his statement indicates that he understands little of the motivations of the Iraqi people, and as such, is unfit to command his group of men who were just ordered into that hell-hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, those stupid, silly Iraqis wouldn't become more effective, would they, General?
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 01:57 PM by hatrack
They've learned nothing in going on four years of learning how to fight us. They're just ineffective, hapless brown people, aren't they?

Lynch is a clueless twit, horching up political hairballs and offering them to us as canapes. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. GEEZE! So if they aren't more effective or possessing of more
resources, then what? They were TOO NICE to do this before? I thought they are terrorists without disregard for life who hate freedom so what was STOPPING them?

That officer is totally politicized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Drinking the KOOL AID
Why would anyone join the armed forces today?

except those with a desire for revenge or a desire to kill a few "Fan Belt Wearers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Excitement and adventure? ...with a gun....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. The re-usable, re-abusable troops -- stiffed again. Bush: "But didja hear what Kerry said...?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. How do we know who is in that?
My brother was nearly killed the first time and really don't want to see him going back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ahhh...CRAP! That will mean another tour
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 03:04 PM by Texas Explorer
for my cousin Kelli. She is a veteran of the Iraq invasion and has been to Fallujah and Baghdad.

I was afraid for her then. The thought of her going back is terrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. And Yet ---- they keep re-enlisting
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 03:26 PM by saigon68
I am out of patience with the support the troops bullshit

For What? So they can go back and kill some more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thingfisher Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I agree...
it is getting difficult to portray an imperial army of occupation as the defenders of freedom and democracy. Even the American soldier is beginning to sense this cognitive dissonance. Will our troops be expected to serve for the long haul with no relief? There are a lot of unhappy troops in Iraq and htey aren't getting nay happier. The enlistment offices are not overflowing with recruits either. So... maybe a draft is next? That would sure mobilize the anti-war effort!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. You don't understand...
Their tours don't coincide with their enlistment date, especially for those who enlisted in the National Guard who joined at random times during High School or otherwise. My brother's enlistment ended last November, for example. Though his tour was not up until December. So he had to reenlist in order to continue being paid the same and receiving benefits. His family couldn't afford otherwise. So they reenlist for a minimum of 1 year and then they risk being sent back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. That's NOT the law...
If your enlistment is up it is up, if you can not leave your enlistment is NOT up. It is a basic concept. Now your enlistment papers often says you can be kept in the military till the rotation is up, but at the end of the deployment, you are released. YOU GET PAID FOR THAT TIME PERIOD EVEN IF YOU DO NOT RE-ENLIST. Your Family is entitled to any benefit as long as you are deployed. This sounds like an attempt to keep people in by tricking them to re-enlist. Remember once you re-enlist the law puts the burden on the enlistee to show he was tricked of was lied to (and even then the enlistee has to show HOW he was tricked given that the enlistment form clearly says they are no terms other than what is on the enlistment form). Sorry, this sounds more like an effort by officer corp to try to keep as many enlistees in the service as they can, even if they have to lie to the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Oh Yes I do Understand
They Re-up for the bennies---get killed and expect us to feel sorry for them

Meanwhile they aid the Chimp in his crusade to make the Halliburton stockholders rich

YUP I DO UNDERSTAND.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. I'm sorry.
Is there anything she'll need or any help we can give? I'm late on my helmet liners, but I could add her to my list--I have some great black wool, soft and gorgeous, just waiting to be knitted up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. I have no doubt the military is lying to re-enlistees...
as much as they are to new recruits.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Does this deserve another sarcastic banner about Kerry and being stuck???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Soldier you have officially been "Marned"
3d ID is the Marne Division. Trust me I know I was Marned several times and in several ways.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Some elements of the 3rd Infantry Division...
have roots that go back to the 92nd 'Buffalo' Infantry Division. I know because I was one, and my unit is making their third tour back to that hellhole. Scut work is the Combat Engineer's middle name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Is that combo of "warned" and "mobilized"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. DANGER, WILL ROBINSON!!!
Unlike its previous two combat tours, however, the Army division will not deploy all at once. Its four combat brigades, now designed as independent fighting units, will go separately and be plugged into existing command structures wherever they are needed in Iraq.

:wow:

:wow:

We're splitting up a Division to plug the gaps we're taking through casualties and attrition?

This is very, very, very bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. most of the shortfall is because soldiers are leaving after being stop-lossed to hell
they have been used, abused, ignored and they still can't get the best body armour because some crooks on the procurement committee are taking backhanders.

Is this supporting the troops, my arse.

The people leaving are long serving and experienced, exactly the kind of people you want to keep in the armed forces. They can get a huge payrise if they go to some 'security consultancy firm', they can afford better equipment as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC