Anyone know what this Drudge headline is about?

[YEM]

NEW YORK TIMES PLANS EXCLUSIVE STORY ON IRAQ AND RESEARCH OF NUKE BOMB... NEWSROOM SOURCE TELLS DRUDGE: 'IT WILL LEAD THE PAPER ON FRIDAY... IT SHOULD IGNITE NEWS CYCLES'... DEVELOPING...


What the hell is this??

[MadMaddie]

1. Is this the October surprise....

Just Guessing....they will come up with some forged documentation pointing to Saddam having Nukes....too little too late...

[Mabus]

4. Or that Iran has that information now

:tinfoilhat: - my hat, not yours.

[MadMaddie]

9. Damn I need to get my own hat....

:tinfoilhat:

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

8. Well, seeing as it's november now...

...I guess not.

[cui bono]

35. Don't see how it would help them anyway... if he did have them, who has them

now?

And it doesn't change the fact that they totally botched up this whole operation. Plus they've changed their minds so many times as to why they went in there.

[babylonsister]

2. November surprise-WMDs found? Jeeze,

[StellaBlue]

3. It's. Too. Late.

nt

[me b zola]

29. And they have played that raggedy old card once too often. n/t

[hexola]

5. Freeps are scratching heads too

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731145/posts

[hexola]

7. Could Iraq have CURRENT Nuke program?

That might be pretty damning...

[HCE SuiGeneris]

34. This Freeper thread is soo heartwarming... thanks hexola :-) ! n/t

[Hosnon]

6. Perhaps the INSURGENTS in Iraq are beginning to research one. nt

[StellaBlue]

11. Yeah, no shit. Probably using that missing NINE BILLION DOLLARS.

:eyes:

[Lex]

10. I hope the NY Times isn't getting duped by the Bushies again.

Like they did on the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq.

[orpupilofnature57]

15. Iraq has a bomb ,Let's attack Iran.That makes sense ,Shrub sense. n/t

[Lex]

12. Maybe dirty bomb material is now in the hands of the insurgents?

Thanks Bush and Cheney!

[eleny]

13. Yeah - that puts the kabosh on feeling safer

[morgan2]

14. its probably about

how they stopped research after gulf war 1.

[seriousstan]

16. I believe there has been an effort to translate the tons of papers and files

that were recovered soon after the invasion. I have heard leaks over the last several months. Generally, the leaks have been very limited. I suspect this is related to that story. Only a guess, but it is my best guess.

[Lex]

17. So maybe Saddam was trying to get his hands on some nuke material?

Well, there's some breaking news, eh?

Apparently Kim Jong Il beat him to it.

[seriousstan]

19. I have no idea how far along Saddam may or may not have gotten.

I do expect a much more detailed view of all his activities when these documents are translated. From what I remember, there were tons of documents that weren't destroyed. I also know that the Iraqi's made very good records, much like the Germans or Cambodians.

hmmmmm....what's up with that? People like to meticulously document their atrocities.

[KAZ]

24. Hmm, 3 years to "translate"? Yeah, I wonder too.

And translating the "tons of documents that were destroyed", God knows how long that will take.

[seriousstan]

28. Just for clarity, you meant to quote "weren't", right?

[KAZ]

31. Correct. n/t

n/t

[GreatCaesarsGhost]

26. are they going to resurrect the stephen hayes story

about wmd from earlier this year? remember him going on the talk shows with it?

now he's cheney's biographer.

[seriousstan]

30. I can't find that, do you have a link?

I found where he talks about an Al-Qaeda/Saddam link but nothing about WMD's.
Thanks.

[GreatCaesarsGhost]

32. here are some

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=stephen+hayes+wmd+translation&btnG=Google+Search

[Annces]

18. Why do you always make posts with question marks

[Connie_Corleone]

20. You forgot a question mark.

[Beetwasher]

21. Someone's Probably Playing Drudge For A Sucka

What else is new.

[bluedog]

22. poster on Yahoo said on the local NYC :Saddam and WMDS

t is supposed to be about Saddam's attempt to get nuclear weapons and material AFTER the gulf war. That is what they just said on the local NYC (not conservative) news radio so I don't know for sure but if that is accurate the Dems will have a COW and eat a lot of crow.(posters words.not mine)

[qanda]

23. They'll bring it out right before the election

And recant right after. I'm so sick of this!

[StellaBlue]

25. I've been wondering all along why *co didn't just PLANT WMDs

:shrug:

[Spazito]

27. I can only say that anything coming from the bush admin re Iraq and

nukes will result with a multitude of rolling eyes. Too little, too late, too obvious, imo.

[Lex]

33. They have ZERO credibility with most Americans now I believe.

Only the true-believer kool-aid drinkers believe them at this point.

[Hamlette]

36. Is it this? That the Bush admin posted papers found in Iraq that tell

anyone who wants to know how to build an a-bomb?
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html?hp&ex=1162616400&en=8326da2ccc77699e&ei=5094&partner=homepage

[johnaries]

37. That's what I'm thinking. Except why would Bushbot Drudge be

all excited? It's bad news for his boy.

[Hamlette]

38. he doesn't get it? He thinks this proves Iraq "had plans" to make nuke?

he's an idiot? All of the above?

[Lex]

39. Yeah, well a lot of third rate dictators 'have plans' to do so but

*now* Bush has put the detailed instructions on the web, just help them along.