Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recap: to bolster WMD claims Bush put nuke secerets online because we lacked translators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:11 PM
Original message
Recap: to bolster WMD claims Bush put nuke secerets online because we lacked translators
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 10:53 PM by troublemaker
Get this story spun right. This is a very BAD story for Bush. This is not about Iran having a nuke program or about Iraqi WMD. The docs are from long ago when Iraq had a nuke program. (presumably pre first Gulf war). There is no controversy that Iraq had a nuke program way back when. (Though some RW morans will doubtless misread this story as saying something different)

The Bush admin was so spazzed out to make bogus claims that they had found anything worthwhile in Iraq they posted sensitive nuke data on the frigging internet which happened to include some nuke data that was not publicly available and that the IAEA fears helped out Iran's nuke program. (This would have been the same post invasion panic phase when Rummy ordered full-on torture in Iraq to find some WMD somewhere, leading to Abu Ghraib)

NYT REPORTING FRIDAY, SOURCES SAY: U.S. POSTING OF IRAQ NUKE DOCS ON WEB COULD HAVE HELPED IRAN...

Federal government set up Web site -- Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal -- to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war; detailed accounts of Iraq's secret nuclear research; a 'basic guide to building an atom bomb'... Officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency fear the information could help Iran develop nuclear arms... contain charts, diagrams, equations and lengthy narratives about bomb building that the nuclear experts say go beyond what is available elsewhere on the Internet and in other public forums... Developing...


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html
http://www.drudgereport.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. So what does this mean...?
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 10:16 PM by ocelot
Bush's government posts Iraq's old nuclear research documents on one of the Internets -- it's all right there, in those tubes -- in order that Iran can use the information, which gives Bush an excuse to attack them? :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. part of a pattern, along with abu ghraib
Not finding WMD lead to some real freak-outs, like Rummy ordering bust-out torture in Iraq and the US posting everything we found in Iraq on the net.

This is what they do... the disclose sensitive info to serve political ends, even when it helps Iran.

Notice that Iran's program is so primitive that these basic docs could have helped them. (Nothing about helping NK which was well advanced past this basic "how to make a bomb" sort of info)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. More Information on the OIFD project > > > > > > > >
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 10:47 PM by troublemaker
notes: Material no longer online (probably)

(docs link on wikipedia is broken link. Nothing jumps out on Google)

Wikipedia summary: "Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents refers to some 55,000 boxes of documents, audiotapes and videotapes that may or may not have been produced by the government of Saddam Hussein. The documents date from the 1980s through the post-Saddam period. The U.S. government seized the records after the 2003 invasion of Iraq and is releasing them on the Internet, requesting Arabic translators around the world to help in the translation. The documents can be found at the Foreign Military Studies Office Joint Reserve Intelligence Center website."


Notice that the web posting was to encourage arab translators world wide to take a crack at it
Please understand that... we didn't have enough Arabic translators so we posted pottentialy sensitive documents we couldn't read on the internet in hopes that Arabic speakers worldwide might translate them for us.

Again, we didn't know what they said, so we posted them on the internet in hopes someone would tell us...

Question, hw many Arabic speakers does Al Queada have? Or Syria, for that matter.

Amazing! It's beyond anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Bush Admin gave Iran nuclear weapons info over the internet?!

Was this inadvertent or by design I'm wondering.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's worse than you think. We put the shit online without knowing what it said!!
It was part of a project to get Arabs around the world to help translate documents we couldn't read due to lack of Arabic translators.

Think about that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Holy Jesus.
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 12:27 AM by Brundle_Fly
and you thought losing 80 truckloads of Iraq explosives was bad.

That means anyone could have access the documents and translated them and sold them to any country...

colossal.

incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. .
K & R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's not the first time
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 12:48 AM by slaveplanet
they got busted for this once before, and have had to remove the documents before,
they are doing this on purpose:

2005 article

On June 26, the CIA posted a press release about Obeidi's cache -- the most valuable WMD evidence the U.S. has yet obtained in Iraq -- on its official website. It also put up digital photos of the components and even one of the key centrifuge diagrams. The pictures, which Albright says could be "incredibly useful" to any regime trying to start a covert nuclear program, were online for almost a week -- long enough to be downloaded and made freely available on the Internet -- before the agency took them down. Literally buried for 12 years, some of Saddam's hoard of nuclear knowledge got out because of the U.S. government, not in spite of it.

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/09/armageddon-2.html


‘The proliferation risk is higher than it was before, and a chaotic situation means this technology is going to spread,’ says Robert Baer, who spent 21 years as a case officer with the CIA in the Middle East. If the administration had been serious about neutralizing Saddam's weapons program, he says, ‘the troops would have been securing equipment at weapons sites as they invaded, and they would have been looking for scientists.... It tells you that this war had nothing to do with WMDs.’”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC