Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ASSUMING we do re-take the house/senate.. the following MUST be on every bill passed..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:28 PM
Original message
ASSUMING we do re-take the house/senate.. the following MUST be on every bill passed..
(or some form thereof)

"The wording and meaning of this legislation are as set forth in this bill. There SHALL NOT BE and WILL NOT BE any modification of meaning or wording of this legislation as passed by any "after the fact" modifications, amendments or SIGNING STATEMENTS. The will of the people, as enacted by the House/Senate shall not be changed except by the methods set forth in the Constitution".


Translated: sign it or veto it and take the lumps Chucklenuts....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds good, no reason why we can't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. its already part of the goddamed constitution. bush doesnt MAKE the laws.
he signs or vetoes them and he enforces them.

in a sane world this alone would be grounds for impeachment. the entire congress should be furious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like it - K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Follow-up question on this,......
----You would think that if Congress is constitutionally allowed to over-ride a veto with a "veto-proof majority" (2/3's? .. 3/4th's?).... then they should likewise be able to do the same thing to Bush's signing statements, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Intersting point... methinks we will see 'signing statements'..
.. before the SCOTUS in '07..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Signing statements have no constitutional status.
They are a convention that has existed for some time in a modest form. Bush and his theory of the urinary executive have transformed 'interpretational' signing statements into 'editorial' signing statements. It will be interesting to watch the original intent conservatives on the court trying to find the sort of power bush has invented for himself in the document they claim is complete as is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Think your last sentence should be part of the contract!
:rofl: EVERY time they send something to his desk, it should include:
"Sign it or veto it and take the lumps, Chucklenuts"

Nothing quite as distasteful to a politican than being openly ridiculed. ;)

Maybe the new DEM Congress should get a rubbers stamp made with that quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's going to be on a bumper sticker...
.. the morning of the 8th if all goes well :) along with a coupla of others I've got planned :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC