Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pat Roberts Once Again Proves He Is A Traitor.......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:52 PM
Original message
Pat Roberts Once Again Proves He Is A Traitor.......
how in the hell does this piece of shit keep his position after this?

Democrats condemn posting of Iraq arms data

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/11/04/democrats_condemn_posting_of_iraq_arms_data/?page=2

<snip>

The documents were posted on the Internet after leading Republicans -- including Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Representative Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, his House counterpart -- lobbied John D. Negroponte , the director of national intelligence, to disclose more information about Iraq's weapons activities.

Kay said yesterday that key administration figures, including Paul D. Wolfowitz , then deputy secretary of defense, also wanted to release the classified information, especially when it became apparent that Iraq had not restarted its weapons programs. After warning him of the consequences about making bomb instructions public, Kay said Wolfowitz reluctantly agreed to keep the documents classified.

But powerful Republicans in the House and Senate pushed through a resolution earlier this year that forced intelligence agencies to review the material and publish as much of it as possible.

Hoekstra yesterday urged a stricter review of sensitive information, but he said only about 40 percent of the documents had been released. Some of the documents, including one that indicated Iraq may have been a year away from building a nuclear bomb before the first Gulf War, were critical in "understanding the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's regime" and the necessity of the Iraq war, he said.

It was such statements -- conflating decades-old intelligence about Iraq's efforts to build a nuclear bomb with the White House's rationale for the 2003 invasion -- that Democrats attacked as misleading.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even the computer hates Hoekstra, his name comes up as mispelled...
and the first suggestion is:

jockstrap!



They should be out of those positions, but if we win it won't matter because they will be anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC