|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
kurth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:22 AM Original message |
Cheney to disregard Congressional subpoenas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. Then he will be found in contempt of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:35 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Paging, Henry Hyde, paging Mr. Hyde... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yes but you are forgetting who is now making the Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Hmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 08:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. Not true, sorry to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
2. Good. Try it, Cheney. Doesn't this mean someone can go in there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
3. Why do OUR 'constitutional officers' ignore the laws of the land....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's good to be King! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
5. Above the law. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
6. Just shows his disregard for the Constitution of the United States |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
7. It's an interesting situation. I can definitely see a Constitutional issue that needs to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
9. With such defiance, it's a shame the House could not impeach the VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
10. Wasn't Clinton subpoenaed by Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:55 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. No such event |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 10:03 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Ah, I sit corrected. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
11. Anyone else find it ironic that Cheney is publicly 'out in front' on issues not yet engaged... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 11:18 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. not surprised at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 06:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. No, I don't believe that at all.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
14. So very arrogant. They think who the hell they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 10:06 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 10:15 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. In the past when there was a dispute between the Executive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 07:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. But there is.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 07:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. A restraining order? On the Presidency itself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Just wondering.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. The gray area is expanded for people not running the executive branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 09:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I'll have to take your word for it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-06-06 10:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. You're thinking too hard. You don't need unitary exec theory for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-07-06 04:20 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. What are your feelings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-07-06 09:14 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. I think, regardless of my FEELINGS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-07-06 04:29 AM Response to Original message |
29. we can have him arrested in 2 years if we play our cards right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-07-06 04:40 AM Response to Original message |
30. he's an arrogant son of a bitch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC