Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Soldiers in Middle East being replaced by Navy personnel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:25 PM
Original message
Soldiers in Middle East being replaced by Navy personnel?
I got a call from mom last night, to relay some info she got from my brother. He's been in the Navy 12 years and reenlisted back in May for another 6 year commitment.

He's just recently found out that the decrease in US "deployable personnel" in Iraq and Afghanistan is because soldiers -- National Guard, Army and Marines -- are being replaced by Navy personnel on "temporary assignment" to do everything from radio and support to gunners and checkpoint guards. Numbers are reported as going down because, as far as Army bean-counters are concerned, sailors are not "deployable" and the only counts they have to report are soldiers. My mom voiced a thought that the rising number of killed an injured comes from, in part, completely inexperienced sailors doing jobs they never wanted to do in the first place (you don't join the Navy if you want to be a ground soldier) for which they were never trained and under conditions totally unlike anything they have done before. My brother heard from an officer that by year's end, some 7% of the entire US Navy will be serving as ground troops in the Middle East.

At the moment, my brother is still in the Navy and still with his ship, but he is mighty, mighty pissed: his training in communications makes it likely that he will end up landside in the desert before too long. And, it seems, no one is telling the rank-and-file; if he had known this was going on, he would not have reenlisted (the Navy is not currently under stop-loss.)

Can anyone provide confirmation that this redeployment from the Navy to the Army is actually occuring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r for an important question
things may drop off fast today that aren't specifically voting related, but this is a good question and I would like to hear the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Damn. This is what I thought they'd do with the Navy call-up.
Can't confirm but I have heard they're using Navy on the ground. Why not? They're using Air Force ground support crews for patrol.

I don't want Rummy fired. I want him hanged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ah yes, similar tings happened in Nam
My brother in law, a radio man, served in country.

No surprises there, and the AF is driving trucks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. yep...yet another manifestation of a "back door draft"
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have a feeling we won't get official word for awhile. I know 2 kids on Navy ships
so I will kick this thread as I can.

:kick: and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Probably there will be no official notice until the Navy goes to stop-loss
I know asking for official word is a bit much :hi: I'm more interested in hearing from DUers who have family in the Navy or who might otherwise be able to confirm this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, it's true. I saw this info in the newspaper about a month ago ...
I don't remember what paper, but Google came up with this USA Today article from May.

"Sailors, airmen land new role"
By Tom Vanden Brook, USA TODAY

5/7/2006

The Navy and Air Force are training their sailors and airmen for war duty far from the seas or skies: jobs typically performed by a strained Army in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Navy and Air Force personnel are replacing Army soldiers to carry out such duties as guarding convoys, patrolling bases and watching for homemade bombs, the top killer of U.S. troops in Iraq.

The Navy also is running a prison in Iraq, patrolling rivers and helping to clear and search buildings.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-07-navy-air-training_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks for the link
I will forward this to my mom and, if they let it through, to my brother as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Urban warfare: " .. helping to clear and search buildings .."
The Navy calls the victims of its bait-and-switch program "Dirt Sailors." The "Dirt Sailors" are pulling some very dangerous "solder-ly" duty on the ground in Bu$h's elective war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Wow! Another item most of us missed.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twilight_sailing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Durn,
my neighbor's kid joined the Navy last year. Good kid.

(There are NO jobs around here.)

I was hoping I wouldn't have to worry about him. Durn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Sky Boy Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. If he's attached to a ship right now he's OK
There is no safer place in a conflict like this than on board a Navy ship.

The U.S.S. Cole was an aberration. We won't make that mistake again.

Ironically the last U.S. warship to be hit by an enemy missile was the USS Stark. Hit by an Iraqi Exocet missile launched from a Mirage F-1 fighter jet in 1987.

I don't think too many of those are operational anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Hi Big Sky Boy!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Sky Boy Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's true
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/02/07/iraq.navy/

Read this a few months ago.

I was a Supply Corps Officer in the Navy Reserves up until 1998, so it doesn't surprise me. Attached to an Emergency Logistics Support Force (ELSF) Unit--We were basically trained to set up warehousing operations in combat situations and other support functions: Dining facilities, payroll, ship store / commissary exchange services etc.

I am happy I am no longer active or I would be there right now.

Understand also that the Marines have been heavily deployed in this conflict and that the Marines are a detachment of the Navy. Which means that Navy personnel provide all the support: Hospital Corpsman, Medical Services, JAG Officers, Chaplains, Supply (which includes Food Service, Payroll, Shipping & Receiving, Barber Shop, Commissary & Exchange Services). They travel with the MARDETS (Marine Detachments) and are certain to be caught in the crossfires.

I've been watching the casualty lists very closely and a lot of the fallen Navy personnel belong to the groups listed above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Operation Blue to Green.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. My brother is Navy
Naval Commander: Retired a decade ago

He has been called back to active duty (ready reserves) a number of times since this war has begun. He served his time in the gulf war and somalia. It's a huge burden on his wife to be left alone with five kids for months on end. It sucks, but he knew going in that this could happen.

I wish he had the freedom to speak what he was really thinking, because I have a feeling he isn't to happy with the current state of our military affairs.

You know, thinking back it makes me realize that when my brother left for the first Gulf War my daughter was 6 weeks old. She just turned 16 and in her lifetime she has watched him deploy during 4 seperate wars/actions.

4 wars in 16 years.

In addition we had a close family friend (national guard) deploy to Bosnia as a PK twice and Iraq twice.

I wonder if she will know peace in her lifetime.

Note: I have heard of Naval Medics being assigned to infantry units. I don't know about other sailors though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC