Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So if Coulter is under investigation for illegal voting, was she allowed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:53 PM
Original message
So if Coulter is under investigation for illegal voting, was she allowed
to vote today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gfnrob Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes but only twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes.
It didn't affect her vote today. That's what I read.

I think it makes sense. I don't think she has been convicted of anything, YET.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope not.....
Godless needs a lesson in civil liberties....:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
I read it somewhere the other day. These criminal thugs can and DO get by with EVERYTHING. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course she was allowed--so now, we get to see just where Miss Annie votes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brazenly Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hope she can vote.
The Bush regime has gutted so many of the laws protecting citizens. I really don't want to see presumption of innocence join posse comitatus and habeas corpus.

The sticky bit about our rights is that landmark rulings protecting and defining them are often established around sleazeballs - the classic example being Miranda. Ernesto Miranda was a sleazebucket criminal. "Miranda rights" were established when he was charged with kidnapping and rape and not informed of his right to counsel and his right not to incriminate himself. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction and a later retrial with new witnesses (and with Mr. Miranda fully informed of his rights) came in with a guilty verdict that stuck.

As tempting as it is, and it is certainly VERY tempting in the case of Annthrax, we have to resist any abrogation of our constitutional rights no matter what kind of human detritus is claiming them, because when one person's rights are violated with impunity, the rights of all of us are endangered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spangle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not convicted yet
Innocent until proven guilty. After she goes to court and is found guilty, then she will loose her right to vote.

Even if she was in jail awaiting trial, she would still be elgiable to vote. Other wise the cops could arrest all sorts of persons before election day, just to prevent them from voting.

After he sentencing and after she pays her 'dues', I'm sure she will feel much differently about felons getting their right to vote back, after doing her 'time'. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC