Lamont has pulled back ahead, IT AIN'T OVER!!!!!

[Greeby]

http://us.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/CT/

[Beetwasher]

1. WHOA!! WTF???

Did they or didn't they call it???? That is AWESOME if true!!

[txindy]

46. Hey, Dewey beat Truman. It said so in the newspapers.

;) It ain't over til it's over. :toast:

[Beelzebud]

2. Keep hope Alive!

[MADem]

3. How the FUCK did the cables call it with eight percent reporting, then? NT

[JerseygirlCT]

16. Don't they use exit polls? They must know things we don't

the local source I've been watching doesn't show results from 3 of our counties yet at all. Perhaps the MSMs think their polling there indicates Lieberman?

I've been wondering, too.

[Jo March]

45. MSNBC called it with just 2% reporting

Tweety went on and on about how Joe is a man of his word. :eyes:

[jbnow]

59. Just a man of his word about

caucusing with Dems.

He has been great on that issue really-saying if Connecticut is against the war they should not vote for joe, that it's simple. That can't say they did all they could about the war or future wars if they vote joe, that being use to him isn't enough, to use their heads...things like that.

He said it as well and simply and often as any tv pundit. I feel the same way. How could they vote joe?

[IndyOp]

4. with 8% of precincts reporting? relax... (n/t)

[pocoloco]

5. HOT DAMN!

[survivor999]

30. Holy shit!

[MadMaddie]

6. You are right....it ain't over till it's over..

[physioex]

7. Oh my damn....

Let's keep our fingers crossed....Hope it is true.

[LibraLiz1973]

8. I am praying extra super hard right now

please god, let Lamont win

[tsuki]

9. Yes! YES! n/t

[Fleshdancer]

10. WHY in the hell was this race called so early???

:wtf:

[Ms. Toad]

39. Two Ohio races were called before ANY results were available

Strickland (Governor) was called ~ 7:30 and Brown was called a little after 8:00. NO results (not even absentee) were disclosed until after 9:00 PM because of the late closing of polls in 16 precincts in Ohio.

[Pab Sungenis]

11. Projections aren't just based on returns.

They're based on statistics and exit polls.

I pray you're right, and they have to pull a Gore-Florida revocation of their call, but I'm not hopeful.

[Fleshdancer]

25. They were just so cautious about these things during the '04 elections

and now they're back to calling it early when we know the race is heated. Crazy pundits.

[kentuck]

12. Don't concede anything Democrats!

Wait until every vote is counted.

[shadowknows69]

I tried to tell you people this in another thread

4% of the precincts reporting and 1000 votes isn't the end. Stop eating what the media feeds you.

[stepnw1f]

13. OK, Who Called It? (nt)

[Gregorian]

14. What's the matter with CT?

Come on! These two are polar opposites. Lamont is a gem!

Please let him get this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Jackpine Radical]

15. This means they previously called it for Lieberman with less than

% of the vote in? Jeez, that's unreal.

[charlie]

17. What's with this projected winner shit

with only single digits of precincts reporting?!

[Rainscents]

18. Who fucking call it in the first place? FOX or CNN?

[chat_noir]

19. ABC

Lamont Dem 30449 47%

Lieberman CTL* 28973 44%

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2006/page?id=2621533&state=CT


But why a check mark by Lieberman????

[Dinger]

20. Oh My God! I'm Breathing Funny!

Damn, I can't take this! (But I will):)

[Sparkly]

21. I think CNN's numbers are behind other sites.... nt

[Atman]

22. It was called based upon "analysis of a sampling of voter comments" or

something absurd like that. This is a bullshit hardball tactic, trying to rattle the Lamont camp and throw 'us off. Lieberman has no integrity...don't expect his corporate supporters to.

.

[AzDar]

23. Go NED Go!!! n/t

[LibraLiz1973]

24. Looking at that link

I think it is way to close to call.

Keep refreshing- it is way to tight to call

[Imalittleteapot]

26. Lamont 47% - Liberman 44% !!!!!!

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006//pages/results/states/CT/S/01/index.html

Still, CNN projects Joe the winner.

[Fleshdancer]

28. It's so weird to see the check mark next to Lieberman's name right now

I would be frustrated as all get out if I were Lamont seeing this.

[lynch03]

27. holllllly shit, i can't believe it the underddog coming back

[CatFelyne]

29. 9:22pm Lamont 46% Lieberman 44% - Hartford Courant

How the hell can you call a race when only 4% results are in

Courant has Lamont ahead, 65 precincts reporting

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/general/by_state/sen_gov/CT.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS&TABULATE=1

[LynzM]

31. 46-44% Lamont! 65/778 precincts in!

65 of 778 precincts in! :bounce: *FINGERS CROSSED!!*

[NashVegas]

35. That's What I'm Seeing

U.S. Senate - 67 of 778 Precincts Reporting
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 31,576 46.60
Lieberman, Joe CTL 30,000 44.27

[cureautismnow]

32. Unfortunately, the exit polls don't look good

If you look at the exit polls on that link, Lieberthal wins most. :-( Hopefully, they and the msm are wrong!

[AntiWarPoster]

33. Come on, don't be like freepers, Lamont lost

exit polls prove it

[trumad]

42. So you believe in exit polls...LOL

I guess you were born in 2005.

[AntiWarPoster]

50. laugh now trummy

but you will see that tomorrow morning, lieberman will still be the winner.

[txindy]

44. Oh, so now exit polls are reliable?

Nice profile there, by the way. :eyes:

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

47. So how does it feel?

Hmm?

[me b zola]

55. Who the phuck are you calling "like freepers"?

You need to step back, get back, or drop back and punt. :grr: Go back to LIEberman/freeper world.

[Subdivisions]

34. CNN reported that Lieberman's camp wasn't ready to

celebrate a win just yet despite CNN calling it for them.

[Sydnie]

36. Local news has Lamont up!

http://www.turnto10.com/politics/10264181/detail.html

[never_get_over_it]

Oh sweet Jesus don't screw with me

I want Lamont to win and LIEberman to just go the fuck away more than I want ANYTHING - I'm going to start praying and I'm agnostic......

[MelissaB]

37. OMG! Kicking until makes greatest.

[htuttle]

38. "Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"

[MelissaB]

40. 10 % of votes in. Kicking again!

[Imalittleteapot]

41. Egads. 45% - 45%

37,176 Lamont
36,970 Liberman

[AzDar]

43. Please, Good Citizens of Connecticut....get rid of Joe-hole. n/t

[izzybeans]

48. So is Steele on Cardin. Projections are not based on these returns alone.

http://us.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate/

[morgan2]

49. ya i didnt think their predictions would be great early

with such an odd race like this.

[sweetheart]

51. how exciting, lamont!!! go baby!

DINO assholes.

[lonestarnot]

52. Shit yeah? NO? Confussed. Please say it is so!

[deadparrot]

53. Are the precincts that haven't been counted yet more conservative?

That might explain the projections...:shrug:

[MelissaB]

54. Lieberman ahead by 2 pts now with 12% in.

[DemonFighterLives]

57. Cnn called it for kissin joe

I'm not feeling so well. :puke:
I can no longer stand to hear Lieberman's little voice.
:puke:

[Imagevision]

56. I don't get it? - tweetie reported adone deal with Lieberman????

[izzybeans]

58. Link to exit polls.

http://us.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/CT/S/01/epolls.0.html

[The Count]

61. Look at the question : "lieberman agrees with * - Not enough/about right/

That gives you who voted for the putz

[Tom Joad]

60. Lamont says its over. According to NY Times.