julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:27 PM
Original message |
How do they project a winner? |
|
I'm very confused how they are calling certain races with small percentages in while not with others with larger percentages. I know some are by larger numbers, but some (like CT) I can't imagine were total blow-outs.
|
texpatriot2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. kick it out of curiousity nm |
Rufus T. Firefly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's a statistics thing. |
|
They pull from random precincts and some such thing. I took PoliSci stat so long ago I don't remember the details, but it made perfect sense at the time I learned it.
|
theothersnippywshrub
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Among other things, they look at overwhelmingly partisan precincts. |
|
For example if an incumbent has historically carried certain precincts with over 80%, but this year carried such precincts with only 60% while the opponent is maintaing or increasing a historical advantage in other precincts, the political "experts" feel confident that the incumbent is going to lose.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |