berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:14 PM
Original message |
stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message |
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. With like 21% of the vote in? |
Art_from_Ark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
WritingIsMyReligion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Booo, you bastard Lieberman! |
|
Fuck that piece of "independent" shit.
|
Nickster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:15 PM
Original message |
Boo! Repub in Dems clothing ... independent my ass |
LynzM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
6. With none of the big cities in!? |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I would imagine the big cities have been in for quite a while |
OctOct1
(357 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Not even 20% counted??? What if he pulls ahead???
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:17 PM
Original message |
If New Haven and Hartford are in there arent enough votes |
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
9. IF he concedes before all the votes are counted...IF...then... nt |
SocratesInSpirit
(540 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Only 21% of precincts are reporting! :mad:
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
18. Those 21% may have 80% of the population |
|
I'm sure Lamont knows the numbers.
|
SocratesInSpirit
(540 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
38. Ok, that would explain it |
|
But it still really, really sucks. :(
Well, at least Schlesinger didn't win.
|
Robeysays
(512 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
11. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!111 |
|
NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURENDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
13. It was closer than the polls that Schumer used to NOT SEND MONEY to Lamont. |
|
And the big name Dems who refused to stand with the Democratic Party and Lamont can go fock themselves - this ain't over.
|
never_get_over_it
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
24. And the reason these Dems didn't stand up for Lamont |
|
is because they are all incumbents and they didn't like those upity CT Dem voters voting out an incumbent in a primary....they all make me sick.....
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but not unexpected. But I REALLY had wished to see Lieberman lose.
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He beleives everything he hears on the corporate media??
|
izzybeans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
Mugsy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Why is Lamont conceeding? |
|
A 2.5% vote shift between him and Joe makes it a tie, with 10% going to the (R) candidate. That has "run off" written all over it.
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
19. shit - crap - f*ck - damn |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I was really hoping for a Democratic pickup in Connecticut. |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
25. Well technically it couldn't have been a pickup |
|
The seat was technically held by a Dem. Though obviously Joe was not a true Dem
|
Fleshdancer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
22. so now what? Will Lieberman stay an Independent or change to Democratic? |
|
Does anyone know his plans?
|
LiviaOlivia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. He'll be shunned by the Dems |
|
and then take a job with BushCo. The repuke gov. will then appoint a repuke Senate replacement.
|
ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
27. He will caucus Dems... |
|
I touched on this in another thread. Despite his support for the war he still votes around 80% progressive. Particularly on choice concerning abortion and labor issues. He will lose his seniority if he switches parties.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
32. He is already a Democrat. |
|
He did not use the Democrats' ballot line is all.
|
Pithy Cherub
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
35. Make every media outlet identify him as CFL |
|
and may all of his money dry up for any future runs. Establishment Dem's should strip him of seniority making it harder for him to gain any funding because this is the last time he'll be funded by republicans unless he switches parties officially.
|
ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Ran a great primary campaign, terrible general... |
|
Note to Senate Candidates, don't ever take a vacation from Jan 1 to first weekend in November.
|
adamuu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
33. he didn't expect to be in double jeopardy |
|
Lieberman did not respect the democratic process. He had a responsibility to concede and direct his constituency to vote for the winner of the primary. That's the point of the @#$%! primary. So, Lamont deserves no blame.
|
izzybeans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Exit poll for this race |
|
Predicts a 10 point difference http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/CT/S/01/epolls.0.htmlLieberman is getting about 66% of the conservative vote. I can't find where the margin of error is in this poll.
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We can't have early concedes in this election.
|
haymark
(128 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
All along the polls were not in Lamont's favor.
|
MzNov
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I am so sad.
Lamont for President?
|
brainshrub
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
37. This is a victory for Progressives. |
|
The lesson: Mainstream Dems are not loyal to the party, so you don't need to vote for them just because they have a "D" after their name.
Plus, between Bernie Sanders in Vermont and Lieberman - no one can now seriously believe that Senate seats can't be won by 3rd party candidates.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |