Mythsaje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:51 PM
Original message |
Oh, NOW the Republicans want to cooperate... |
|
LOL.
And, of course, the Dems will put out the bi-partisan olive branch and, if it happens, the Republicans will take it from them and, at the first opportunity, beat them to death with it.
Mehlman's trying to say, right now, that bi-partisanship means buying the "Bush Doctrine."
:rofl:
Do we look stupid?
|
99Pancakes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think we're better than that.
|
Democrat 4 Ever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yeah, we have spent the last 12 years watching these asswipes |
|
thumb their noses at the Dems. Impeached a president for a BJ, refused to investigate any time a repug does the nasty, dismantled the Ethics Committee, refused to allow any amendments but repugs, extended voting times, blackmailed anyone who employed a Dem lobbyist, lock committee room doors to prevent Dem led hearings, ran up a debt that we just can't keep adding zeros fast enough, killed over 2,800 people and counting, left so many children behind. Oh, hell, who could name all of Kenny Boy and The Cabal messes? Yeah, Kenny Boy, now you what to play nice?
Just get out of the way, Ken, and take your Repugs, there is work to do to clean up this corrupt mess you guys have made and we don't need to be distracted by your yammering.
|
johnnyrocket
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I will be livid, if the Dems do cooperate with the GOP scum. |
|
Investigate, oversight, IMPEACH!
|
renate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Chris Matthews was doing a good job of pointing out... |
|
... that Mehlman was basically saying "We're willing to cooperate with you now, as long as you do it our way."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message |