omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:52 AM
Original message |
The House of Representatives is the one that brings Articles of Impeachment, right? |
|
And then the Trial is held in the Senate?
|
garthranzz
(983 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |
Lucky Luciano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Imprison Impose the harshest possible penalty for treason ;)
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
|
And John Conyers Jr. will be chair of the Judiciary Committee!!!
|
Independent_Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
magellan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
If he and I weren't both already taken. lol
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes, and the sooner the better |
GreenPartyVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Yes, but Nancy said that wasn't on the agenda. At least I thought she said that. |
omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. "Off the Table"... mebbe it's somewheres else |
|
"Weapons of Mass Impeachment?.......nuthin over here......heh heh he heh................. nuthin under der.......... he heh heh snicker snicker............."
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
18. She can change her mind... after the investigation. |
|
First you drain the swap.
When you shine a little light into the ratholes, ya never know what you will find.
If, for example, there is CLEAR (under oath) testimony that we were going to start the war, no matter what, and that the President and Veep conspired to get us into that war... well, "under the light of this new evidence, we simply have to consider impeachment, the American public would expect no less".
|
omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
oh ya mean like the PNAC and the DSM and the 16 words in the SOTU?
|
meow2u3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. She said BUSH's impeachment was "off the table" |
|
She never mentioned anything about going after his henchmen, especially Cheney and Rummy.
|
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
7. That's an affirmative, rubber ducky. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Why do you think Roberts is on the court?? nt |
omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
16. Cuz Feinstein rolled over? |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:55 AM
Response to Original message |
|
In seriousness, they should not proceed unless they have a strong, compelling case (like can get a near-majority of Republican Senators to go along with it) against both Bush and Cheney.
In seriousness, I think that can be done. In any case, the first stage is investigations. Those will now take place.
|
Independent_Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
Investigate and gather up all your evidence first.
|
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 12:59 AM
Response to Original message |
kysrsoze
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message |
17. OK, I figure if it comes, it's because the evidence is so tight... |
|
he can't get out of it. However, I'd LOVE to see the Dems legilatively smack the shit out of him for the next two years. Now that I think of it though, I would imagine his @ssness would start vetoing everything.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |