Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 05:46 AM
Original message |
"In God's holy name...." Holy Joe promising to do his job |
|
in this manner in his victory speech. How could Connecticut do this?
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 05:47 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I cannot understand, skidmore. nt |
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 05:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Time will tell if they made the right decision |
|
Too bad the party did not spend more on Lamont..but realistically, they knew they would have a "D" , no matter who won, so they left him on his own, while Holy Joe was backed by the republican money..lots of it..
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 05:50 AM
Response to Original message |
3. he'll screw the dems on |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 05:50 AM by xchrom
judicial nominees and vote with the repukes then.
and the iraq debacle? -- i can't WAIT to see those votes.
well joe -- you did it -- but you needed repuke money and repuke votes to do so. you can SAY you don't owe them -- but we know you do.
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 05:50 AM
Response to Original message |
4. So, has Bush officially offered him |
pissedoffprogressive
(322 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 05:50 AM
Response to Original message |
5. All the Repuks voted for him. Fuckers |
izzie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 06:16 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I can not understand his love of this war. |
|
It seems like such a bad thing before we even went in.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message |