Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman will keep his promise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:07 AM
Original message
Lieberman will keep his promise
I am disappointed as hell that Lamont did not win but I think Lieberman will vote for a democratic senate leadership. Joe is a ambitious bastard and after the election last night it's pretty obvious which way the political winds are blowing in this country. He will not attach himself to a party that was just completely trounced.

OK back to your regularly scheduled celebration :party: :toast: :bounce: :toast: :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. It depends how the recounts go
Joe is just as likely to caucus with the Republicans as he is the Democrats. Because, after all, it is all about Joe.
I surely wouldn't count on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. He is closer to the Republican view on foreign policy
but not on domestic affairs. I think he will almost certainly caucus with the Dems, but he'll remain a hawk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. According to CNN this morning, he will be sworn in as an independent
It would appear that he will not be classed with the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. I know that, but he promised to vote with the dems for control of the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. exactly, he'll side with Power as usual
what ever it takes to get those chairmanships is OK with me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. He'll caucus with the Dems in order to maintain his seniority. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ferret Annica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Take the senority away
Make having it actually MEAN SOMETHING! He ain't no frigging Demo, don't treat him like one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Since I live in CT and Joe played up his role as a power-player
Since I live in CT and Joe played up his role as a power-player, I'm demanding lots of pork and earmarks for my state. I want a massive project to upgrade/improve the New Haven to New York corridor for starters. I don't even care if they call it the Joementum Project if he can get that done.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ferret Annica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Screw automobiles
Don't waste money on cars. I moved from Connecticut because the place is paved to oblivion and traffic on the complte spectrum of roads is out of control.

Build more mass transit, do not waste another dime on I-95!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, but which one?
You don't think all that Repub support for his "independant"
campaign came with no strings attached, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lieberman Can Go to Hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. IIRC, on Imus this morning, the Cheaterman said "Revenge
is a dish best served cold". He may have been joking, but I don't think so. I so hope that someone is still looking at his $400,000 slush fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh, Joe has already demonstrated his word was meaningless
We can't trust a word he says. You can be sure of one thing and one thing only...Joe will do what is in the best interest of Joe. Period. If Joe gave a shit about anything else, he would not have stolen the votes and effectively disenfranchised a huge number of CT democrats who went to the polls, chose their candidate, and essentially were told their votes didn't mean a thing.

He'll be no different, and in fact, he might actually take this as some sort of affirmation of his whining, conniving, weaseling strategy and just become worse. Joe won't get it, that he was elected by REPUBLICANS, not democrats. Or...maybe he will? Who knows. He's a disgrace, imo.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I know his word means nothing. I was saying that he will vote with the dems
purely out of self-interest and ambition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Keep his promise to be a warmonger? You bet
Fork him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yeah, let's give Cheney the deciding vote for the sake of ideological purity
Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm not a Lieberman fan, but I am impressed that he won after all that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. Unfortunately, Reid and the senate dems need to kiss his ass
Joe now has the power to switch the senate back to Repuke if the dems annoy him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. I suspect the Republicans don't even want him in their party
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 09:35 AM by LeftishBrit
They'd rather have him as their pet donkey, to prove how 'bipartisan' their policies are, than as their rogue elephant.

If he did switch parties, I suspect he'd end up making political history as the only incumbent to have been chucked out in the primaries of BOTH parties.

It's a pity he won, and a pity that deals may have to be made with him. But after all, in the many countries with multi-party PR-based systems, it would be routine to have to make a few deals with the otherwise-insignificant members of weird minor parties in order to keep overall control. Better that than Cheney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC