Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What are the prospects for the 2008 senate election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:38 AM
Original message
What are the prospects for the 2008 senate election?

The Congress and the Presidency are obviously both up for grabs, but how many of the Senate seats coming up for reelection in 2008 are Dems, how many are Reps, and how many might change hands each way?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Depends On
1. Whether the Democrats grow a spine in the next two years
2. How quickly the Republicans clean house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nope.
Regardless of those two, prospects for dem Senate pickups in 2008 are excellent. Repukes have far more seats up than dems, and some of those are vulnerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Repubs will be defending 21 seats, Dems only 12
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 11:23 AM by fishwax
So we stand a good chance of increasing our majority. Many of the defending Repubs are in the south, where we proved this time around we can be competitive. TN will be up again, and maybe this time we can close the gap.

Two seats repubs are defending are in traditional blue states (Oregon and Minnesota), and there will be repub defenses in states where we've made inroads recently, including New Mexico, Colorado, Idaho, Wyoming, and Oklahoma.

We will be defending seats in some red states, too, such as South Dakota, Louisiana, and Arkansas (though Arkansas showed up well for dems last night).

All in all, I think the prognosis looks good.

Here's a link to the wikipedia page, with a map of the races ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlurker Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Lamar has only been in for one term
He won for the first time in 2002. Prior to that he was a frequent presidential candidate and two term governor for Tn. He is up there in age though. He will be 68 in 2008. Although that is not really that old for senator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. thanks for the correction
I edited my post to reflect that. I was just thinking he'd been *in* forever because he's been *around* forever, and I was thinking of him from the first bush administration.

Thanks :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent. The Reich Is Defending 21 Senate Seats vs 12 Democratic In 08
This fact is probably part of the reason for all the long faces on Reich quislings.

Short of a Democratic collapse, there is little chance of the Reich making gains in 08 when defending 9 seats more than the opposition.

Reich Defense (21)

Alaska - Stevens
Oregon – Gordon
Idaho – Craig
Wyoming – Enzi
Colorado – Allard
New Mexico - Domenici
Nebraska – Hagel
Kansas - Roberts
Oklahoma – Inhofe
Texas – Cornyn
Minnesota - Coleman
Kentucky – McConnell
Virginia – Warner
Tennessee – Alexander
North Carolina – Dole
South Carolina – Graham
Mississippi – Cochran
Alabama – Sessions
Georgia – Chambliss
New Hampshire – Sununu
Maine – Collins

Democrats Defense (12)

Montana – Baucus
South Dakota – Johnson
Iowa – Harkin
Illinois – Durbin
Arkansas – Pryor
Louisiana – Landrieu
West Virginia – Rockefeller
Michigan – Levin
Delaware - Biden
New Jersey - Lautenberg
Rhode Island – Reed
Massachusetts – Kerry

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dupe
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 10:56 AM by loindelrio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. They look great
The only seat we might have to defend is Johnson in South Dakota. We have good shots at getting Minnesota, Colorado, Georgia, New Hampshire (New Hampshire turned really blue this year) and Maine (Collins might retire).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Very good IMHO
Depending on retirements and national climate, we have good chances for pickups in OR, CO, NM, TN, VA, NC, NH, and ME. The Republicans have less shiney prospects and I'd assume would try to focus on MT, SD, AR, LA, and NJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Even those don't look that promising for the Repubs
Max Baucus won easily his last time out, and with Tester's win last night Montana doesn't look bad for the Dems. South Dakota might be a problem, but then Thune did win in '02 and Herseth won again state-wide last night. And the abortion ban failed there, so maybe things are looking up for dems in south dakota. Mark Pryor is a popular incumbent in Arkansas, and that state showed well last night.

I think Louisiana will probably be a republican pickup, if the conventional wisdom about post-katrina demographic shifts holds true. She barely won in '02 anyway. And New Jersey, too, might be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. regardless, we need to start ramping up now.
there are a very few repugs that i would not object to but more that i would like to see go down. we need to start on their opponents campaigns now. perhaps find a place (moveon?) to bank some funds for dem challengers campaigns.

2008 could be an even better year than 2006 even if the repugs kept the presidency. of course that all depends on how the dems act in the next 2 years.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC