Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gitmo's human "state secret"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 11:38 AM
Original message
Gitmo's human "state secret"

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/11/06/secret_existence.php


Secret Existence

Since so much was happening this weekend politically, it was easy to miss one story by The Washington Post on Saturday, which covered the Justice Department's declaration that one of our detainees at Guantánamo is a human “state secret.” Meaning the very act of being a detainee had given the man “Top Secret” information which he’s not supposed to share—like with a lawyer. What do you know about our torture techniques and where our black sites are? Sorry, you weren’t supposed to know that, therefore no lawyer for you.

That’s right folks, Majid Khan, one of the detainees from the CIA “black sites” is not allowed to talk about his detention and (likely) torture because the lawyer he could speak to doesn’t have clearance to know about U.S. detention policies and “interrogation” procedures.

That a government lawyer could even offer this kind of Kafkaesque argument means someone truly has drunk the Kool-Aid down at the Justice Department.

-snip-

Or is it, perhaps, that he "came into possession" by virtue of the fact that he is the "classified information"? That is to say, it was the CIA's torture of Khan -- sorry, its "application of alternative interrogation techniques against him" -- that was how Khan "came into possession" of our most closely guarded secrets.

As DOJ sees it, Khan can't have a lawyer because of the risk that he'll tell the lawyer about that classified info that he now "possesses." (Here's the DOJ Brief.)

Considering how weak the Justice Department's legal argument is there’s little doubt it won’t stand up in court. (At least one would hope). But that’s probably not their goal in the long term. I suspect Justice knows they are going to lose but by filing this ridiculous brief they can delay the legal gears from turning and—likely more importantly—keep the airwaves freed of horrible detainee abuse stories which might reach the ears of federal judges. It's a simple roadblock theory: The longer Khan is kept from a lawyer the longer it will take for him to be freed. (The Center for Constitutional Rights, who filed on Khan’s behalf, has also filed a habeas petition, but expects the access to council issue to be settled first. You can read about his case here.)

-------------------------


Gitmo should be surrounded with yellow crime scene tape
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Amazing isn't it? A country celebrates the process of "democracy" while
people are being tortured and held incommunicado in the name of that democracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gitmo should be turned into a museum like a Nazi German concentration camp after the war. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC