Was Rummy a tradeoff for no impeachment?

[Gidney N Cloyd]

[originalpckelly]

1. Yes, the guy who is coming in is a dem-republican...

he's a super good guy. We've won.

We'll either win in Iraq or cut our loses. The fella coming in is a member of the Baker-Hamilton commission, this is great!!! REALITY ROCKS!!!!

[crikkett]

9. the guy coming in is from Iran-Contra

that doesn't sound like a good guy to me.

[Crazy Dave]

2. Distancing himself from future co-defendant in war crimes?

n/t

[Freedom_from_Chains]

3. I think he may have gotten the message thea it's time to play ball,

or things could get really tough. Or at least that is what I got from Nancy Pelosi's speech earlier.

[itsmesgd]

4. no the tradeoff is the same that Nixon got.

Leave now or we get the handcuffs.

He's going to be leaving for Paraguay or Uraguay shortly.....

[Lithos]

5. No

He's still in denial and trying to bargain out of it. There is no way they had a replacement this fast, this was something that had been talked about much earlier, the fact he pulled the trigger now is him trying to come to grips with the crap.

I hate to say this, but the Pukes have blown it with their arrogance. I'm hoping they go bankrupt when the lawsuits come in from the robo-calls. As for Bush, impeachment is going to be demanded once the investigations begin. For even if 10% of the crap they've done comes out in full light at this time, it will be enough to cause the American public to want them out of there.

L-

[Virginia Dare]

6. Rummy did not want to be called before any Democratic-led Committee...

Once the investigations into war crimes and fraud begin, it will be a bloodbath.

[Orrex]

8. Can't he still be called?

Or does Committee-power extend only to members of the government?

[in_cog_ni_to]

7. NO. these corrupt bastards will have their day when

the investigations begin.