The answer is not impeachment. It is Censure!!!!!!!!

[Perky]

[Jack Rabbit]

1. Could you elaborate on that?

Censure is merely a symbolic rebuke.

I don't want symbolism. I want the junta ousted.

[jayctravis]

4. Bush is in check; get the other pieces off the board.

Get the country behind us, get soldiers out of Iraq, do the good stuff we want to and INVESTIGATE INVESTIGATE INVESTIGATE.

Do it symbolically in a year or so, and save the money for the country.

[onehandle]

2. 24 hour a day investigation without impeachment.

And in 2008 we can say, "Clinton was impeached for lying about a blowjob, but we did not waste the time that they GOP did running an impeachment, even though Bush did this, and this, and this...etc."

This will help us in 2008.

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

3. The answer is a war crimes tribunal at the Hague.

[Mr Rabble]

9. Right on.

[FuzzyDicePHL]

5. IMO the answer is

indictment.

[grizmaster]

6. agreed

It can be done immediately, and dems in Congress can get on with the critical work of restoring our nation and our Constitution.

[porphyrian]

7. If you believe in our Constitution, there is no question we must impeach.

That doesn't mean we should begin before we have gathered evidence and a consensus in Congress.

[derby378]

8. I gotta call BS on this - CLINTON was censured

This imperious asshat, on the other hand, deserves something more than mere censure.

Impeachment is the only way to go. Start the investigations and get Conyers on the job with subpoena power. If Pelosi stands in the way of impeachment even if the investigations call for impeachment, then Pelosi has to be sent back to San Francisco.

[shraby]

10. This president has committed impeachable

crimes. That calls for nothing less then an investigation into how deep his crimes went and impeachment followed by a trip to the Hague for further decisions on his and his co-hort's fates.