Plaid Adder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:33 PM
Original message |
Why are the 2 independents being counted as Democrats? |
|
Supposing that Webb does win, by my count that's 49 Republicans, 48 Democrats and 2 independents. How does that work in terms of who runs committees and whatnot? Could Lieberman still fuck this up for us?
TIA for the answers,
The Plaid Adder
|
Mythsaje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. One of them's Bernie Sanders. |
|
That says something.
And Lieberman will go along with the crowd, I think.
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
11. Jolting Joe said today on Imus that he will vote with the |
|
Dems on procedural matters... so, with VA, that's 51-49 for all the committee assignments and everything. He said that he had to do that to maintain his seniority.
He then said that he would be much more independent on all other votes.
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's all about voting for Majority Leader. |
|
Lieberman would have to break his promise to caucaus with the Democrats in order for us not to get the committees and such (assuming that Webb wins, which looks like a good assumption at this point).
|
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Lieberman has no say about who's the majority. 50 gives us the majority. As far as voting on individual items, that's another story, though.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
16. Lieberman Makes It 51. If It's 50 Cheney Casts The Deciding Vote |
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
19. No - 50-50 will give Cheney the deciding vote. |
|
Which is what would happen if Webb won, but Lieberman caucused with the GOP. So, we need him.
|
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 06:08 PM by wryter2000
Just figured out my dum misteak. I didn't realize one of the D's in the Senate was a hold and not a turn-over for us. Clearly, we're talking 49, 49, 2.
Hmmmm. I trust Bernie Sanders. :)
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They have both said they will caucus with the Democrats. |
|
Lieberman could change his mind and caucus with the repubs. Yes. He could fuck this up for us.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. Lieberman only agrees w the Repubicans on Iraq |
|
At this point, who cares about what Republicans say about Iraq.
On social issues he votes with Democrats.
|
BattyDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Both have said they will caucus with the Dems |
|
so for all practical purposes, they are counted as Dems.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. Just repeating BECAUSE THEY SAID THEY WILL CAUCUS WITH THE DEMS |
|
cuz no-one is paying attention to your post. . .
:patriot:
|
AZBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Good question about committees - I was wondering the same thing |
|
Folks here on DU keep saying we won the Senate, but I don't agree - I think we tied. I don't trust that Lieberman will always go with the Dems after everything that's happened and after the R's helped him win. I'm not being a naysayer - I think we did great and should be proud. I'm just being a realist.
|
Swede
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Both have said they would caucus with the Democrats. |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
7. this is what i think, Lieberman will get to chair the homeland security comm. |
|
and he will caucus with the democrats. This is why some senate democrats supported him.
|
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Isn't that 50 D, 48 R, 2 I?
I see your overall point, though. They aren't D's. However, that does give us the majority (as when it was 50 D, 49 R, and 1 I).
Bernie Sanders will vote with us. Lieberman's another case, though. I wouldn't call him a Dem.
|
Matariki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. I think your math is wrong(?) |
|
Isn't it 49 D, 49 R, and 2 I ?
With the 2 I's caucusing w/ the Democrats it's 51 to 49
|
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
22. Okay, I'm clearly confused. |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 06:01 PM by wryter2000
Thanks. In any case, 49 + 48 + 2 does not equal 100.
|
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Sanders has always caucused with the Democrats and can be |
|
counted on to support progressive ideas. Can you see Bernie with the Republicans? They'd be looking for their talimans to ward off the evil eye of a real, capital L, Lib'rul.
Lieberman, who knows? I don't trust him.
|
Critters2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
15. They say they're going to caucus with the Dems |
|
So, we have to make nice with that bastard Lieberman. Dammit.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
17. both said they'd caucus with the Democrats |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
18. One's a proud Socialist. The other - Joementum - has said he will. |
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message |
20. They will caucus with the Democrats. |
|
In the Senate, what gives the majority party the majority is not actual numbers of party members, it's who votes for whom. Since Sanders and Lieberman will caucus with the Dems, that gives the Dems the leadership. It's the votes that counts.
|
Vadem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Are you sure they are? How can they be counted as Dems when... |
newsguyatl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
24. they've both pledged to caucus with dems |
|
so that in effect equals BEING a dem in terms of power
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message |