Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are the 2 independents being counted as Democrats?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:33 PM
Original message
Why are the 2 independents being counted as Democrats?
Supposing that Webb does win, by my count that's 49 Republicans, 48 Democrats and 2 independents. How does that work in terms of who runs committees and whatnot? Could Lieberman still fuck this up for us?

TIA for the answers,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. One of them's Bernie Sanders.
That says something.

And Lieberman will go along with the crowd, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Jolting Joe said today on Imus that he will vote with the
Dems on procedural matters... so, with VA, that's 51-49 for all the committee assignments and everything.
He said that he had to do that to maintain his seniority.

He then said that he would be much more independent on all other votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's all about voting for Majority Leader.
Lieberman would have to break his promise to caucaus with the Democrats in order for us not to get the committees and such (assuming that Webb wins, which looks like a good assumption at this point).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Assuming Webb wins
Lieberman has no say about who's the majority. 50 gives us the majority. As far as voting on individual items, that's another story, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Lieberman Makes It 51. If It's 50 Cheney Casts The Deciding Vote
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. No - 50-50 will give Cheney the deciding vote.
Which is what would happen if Webb won, but Lieberman caucused with the GOP. So, we need him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Ooops
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 06:08 PM by wryter2000
Just figured out my dum misteak. I didn't realize one of the D's in the Senate was a hold and not a turn-over for us. Clearly, we're talking 49, 49, 2.

Hmmmm. I trust Bernie Sanders. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. They have both said they will caucus with the Democrats.
Lieberman could change his mind and caucus with the repubs. Yes. He could fuck this up for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Lieberman only agrees w the Repubicans on Iraq
At this point, who cares about what Republicans say about Iraq.

On social issues he votes with Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Both have said they will caucus with the Dems
so for all practical purposes, they are counted as Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Just repeating BECAUSE THEY SAID THEY WILL CAUCUS WITH THE DEMS
cuz no-one is paying attention to your post. . .

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good question about committees - I was wondering the same thing
Folks here on DU keep saying we won the Senate, but I don't agree - I think we tied. I don't trust that Lieberman will always go with the Dems after everything that's happened and after the R's helped him win. I'm not being a naysayer - I think we did great and should be proud. I'm just being a realist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Both have said they would caucus with the Democrats.
Heard that on the tube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. this is what i think, Lieberman will get to chair the homeland security comm.
and he will caucus with the democrats. This is why some senate democrats supported him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Math
Isn't that 50 D, 48 R, 2 I?

I see your overall point, though. They aren't D's. However, that does give us the majority (as when it was 50 D, 49 R, and 1 I).

Bernie Sanders will vote with us. Lieberman's another case, though. I wouldn't call him a Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I think your math is wrong(?)
Isn't it 49 D, 49 R, and 2 I ?

With the 2 I's caucusing w/ the Democrats it's 51 to 49
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Okay, I'm clearly confused.
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 06:01 PM by wryter2000
Thanks. In any case, 49 + 48 + 2 does not equal 100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sanders has always caucused with the Democrats and can be
counted on to support progressive ideas. Can you see Bernie with the Republicans? They'd be looking for their talimans to ward off the evil eye of a real, capital L, Lib'rul.

Lieberman, who knows? I don't trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. They say they're going to caucus with the Dems
So, we have to make nice with that bastard Lieberman. Dammit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. both said they'd caucus with the Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. One's a proud Socialist. The other - Joementum - has said he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. They will caucus with the Democrats.
In the Senate, what gives the majority party the majority is not actual numbers of party members, it's who votes for whom. Since Sanders and Lieberman will caucus with the Dems, that gives the Dems the leadership. It's the votes that counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Are you sure they are? How can they be counted as Dems when...
they are Independents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. they've both pledged to caucus with dems
so that in effect equals BEING a dem in terms of power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC