Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm doing the Virginia math right now: JIM WEBB WILL WIN, BUT MAY FACE RECOUNT!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:39 PM
Original message
I'm doing the Virginia math right now: JIM WEBB WILL WIN, BUT MAY FACE RECOUNT!!!!!
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 02:39 PM by originalpckelly
Isle of Wight has one of the precincts not reporting in yet. This is a county which went to Bush with 62.56% of the vote in 2004.

So far this has still gone to George Allen, but it was a much closer margin, Jim Webb got 10% more of the vote in this election so far.

The precise precinct that is still outstanding (Raynor 0505), only has 177 votes. This did go mildly Republican in last year's governors race. In other words it won't hurt Webb's 8000+ vote lead.

In the other county which has outstanding precincts, James City County, the outstanding precincts aren't significant.


My conclusion is that Jim Webb's lead is solid, unless they find some sort of major 8000 vote error, it will not go to George Allen. However, if Allen wants to be a dick, Webb's lead is not enough to avoid a free recount (if Allen requests it.)

Recount: If Allen wants it.
Win: Jim Webb will probably win!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here is the county by county list of votes for the fellas:
http://sbe.virginiainteractive.org/nov2006/l_02.htm

You can click on the counties, and then you can see the precise precincts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Allen has the voter suppression problem hanging over his head...
he should be gracious and concede for that reason alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Webb has already won. This is some kind of half ass face saving
Considering the uphill climb needed by Webb to win in that place, 8000 votes is a hell of a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. And the canvass will not make a substantive change, either.
Law of large numbers, the errors will tend to cancel each other out.

7-8 thousand votes is way too many for a recount to substantively change. The usual difference, even if there is bias in the sample, is a few hundred votes.

Webb's going to be going to the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Could the Va. Dem Party sue Allen for vote suppression?
(Quietly agreeing to drop the suit if he doesn't recount.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, they have audio recordings of Allen voter suppression...
or voter suppression which was in favor of Allen.

I know, I heard one of the recordings myself.

So in other words, I think that the only one keeping Allen in the race is that total dick Ed Gillespie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Right now Webb is ahead by 7,306 votes. The difference is
.025% which is under 1/2 or 1% (0.5%). There will be a State funded recount whether Allen requests it or not. The recount will be completed and certified on 11/14/06. In last years AG race McConnell defeated Democrat Craig Deeds by 700 votes. The recount only rechecked the totals submitted to each district. Deeds went to court to have everything recounted, but lost. After the recount, the margin of difference was 400 votes and McConnell became the State AG. Allen does not have a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I know...
He's just being a total asshole.


May I just say, y'all have a lot of hassle in your elections. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. In Virginia, there are no automatic recounts. (where do you see
otherwise?

Quote from the Commonwealth of Virginia State Board of Elections, dated November 2006, "Virginia Recount Basics":

In Virginia, there are no automatic recounts. Only the apparent losing candidate can ask for a recount, and only if the difference between the apparent winning and losing candidate is 1% or less of the total votes cast for the two candidates. The apparent loser cannot request a recount until after the election is certified.

The State Board of Elections certifies the election results for all federal offices (Presidential Electors, U.S. Senate and U.S. Congress), state offices (Governor, Lt. Governor, and Attorney General and General Assembly seats) and any offices shared by two or more localities. The State Board of Elections will meet to certify the results of the November 7, 2006 election on Monday, November 27, 2006. An apparent losing candidate has ten days from the certification date to request a recount, so the time frame for filing a request for a recount for this election is November 27, 2006, through December 7, 2006.

An apparent losing candidate requesting a recount of an election for a statewide office must file a petition requesting a recount with the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond. Any candidate requesting a recount for any other office must file a recount petition with the Circuit Court where that candidate is registered to vote.

<snip>

The counties and cities involved in a recount are responsible for paying the costs of the recount if the margin of difference between the apparent winning and losing candidates is a half of a percent or less or the candidate requesting the recount is declared the winner. Otherwise, the candidate who requested the recount must pay the costs of the proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. My understanding
was there is no automatic recount in Virginia. It has to be requested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You are correct. Allen must request it.
The State pays if it is w/in 0.5% and Allen pays if the difference is greater. Here is the Statute:

§ 24.2-800. Recounts in all elections.

A. The provisions of this article apply to all elections held in the Commonwealth.

B. When there is between any candidate apparently nominated or elected and any candidate apparently defeated a difference of not more than one percent of the total vote cast for the two such candidates as determined by the State Board or the electoral board, the defeated candidate may appeal from the determination of the State Board or the electoral board for a recount of the vote as set forth in this article. In an election of electors for the President and Vice President of the United States, the presidential candidate shall represent the vice-presidential candidate and slate of electors and be the party to the recount for purposes of this article.

C. When there is between the vote for a question and the vote against a question a difference of not more than fifty votes or one percent of the total vote cast for and against the question as determined by the State Board or the electoral board, whichever is greater, fifty or more voters qualified to vote on the question, by signing and filing their petition, may appeal from the determination of the State Board or the electoral board for a recount of the vote as set forth in this article.

(1979, c. 293, § 24.1-249; 1981, c. 570; 1993, c. 641.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. He has Nov 27 - Dec 7 to request one
An apparent losing candidate has ten days from the certification date to request a recount, so the time frame for filing a request for a recount for this election is November 27, 2006, through December 7, 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. he is a dick
a very small one but a dick none the less. We will have a recount and no declared winner until Dec 8 or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. As much as I dislike Allen
If it were the other way around we would certainly be calling for a recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. One other thing to consider here...
The Macaca camp is now saying they haven't made up their minds (such as they are) whether they're going to call for a recount.

There's a reason for that.

Remember, they pulled a lot of slimy crap in the final days of the campaign - which would definitely be considered voter fraud. The FBI is already looking into what went on in Virginia.

If Allen decides to go for the recount, that would give the FBI plenty of time to look at relevant documents - phone records, campaign disbursements, all kinds of stuff.

It could be that the only way that Allen can avoid facing big-time criminal charges (not that he won't be facing them anyway).

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC