Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What bones can we throw the Republicans?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:37 PM
Original message
What bones can we throw the Republicans?
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 04:38 PM by Donald Ian Rankin
My understanding of the political situation now (N.B. I'm not an American, and I may have misunderstood how your system works) is that the Democrats can pass any legislation they want in the houses, give or take but can't get it past a presidential veto without Republican support, whereas the Republicans can't get legislation past either house without some Democratic support.

What that means, presumably, is horse-trading - if we (by which I mean "the Democratic leadership; I'm including myself in simply as a shorthand, on the gronds that they're "the team I support", as it were) want to pass laws that the Republicans don't like, we're also going to have to let them pass some that we don't like.

So what horses should we trade? What concessions are there that we can painlessly or least painfully make to the Republicans in exchange for getting legislation past the veto?

And what should be our top priorities to bargain *for*?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Try Geronimo's skull for starters.
Seriously, though I think we should offer them (for a very LIMITED time only) complete amnesty should they agree to step down and leave the country immediately and permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Extra chairs for their basement cleaning closet meeting room?
Maybe throw in an extension cord!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I might even go so far as to offer a space heater for the winter months...
But then, I'm generous to a fault...and the GOP has many!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Agreed.
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 04:53 PM by ShortnFiery
Sorry right now I'm in a celebratory mood. Democrats always try to compromise and build consensus with SANE, NON-CORRUPT and REASONABLE Republicans. The foregoing is why we lose so many battles against these, often times, underhanded and greedy cheater-babies. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. It's not a matter of consensus. It's about self-interest.

I think the way to look at it is to regard the Republicans as an occupational hazard, without either animus or compassion.

The question we should be asking is "how can we get these people to concede as much of what we want as possible", and neither saying please nor blustering will get anywhere; the only way to make them do what we want is to make them getting something they want conditional on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. LIEberman's thigh bone
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. The rest of Senator Macaca's deer caucus. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republicans have had six years of passing every bill they liked
the only things they still want are privatization of Social Security and permanent tax cuts for the wealthy.

They got everything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. We won't indict it they help us override ALL of Bush's vetoes
AND they help us impeach and convict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Let's see...
...I'm thinking a visit to the Smithsonian's Museum of Natural History, to obtain a nice big T. Rex thigh bone to thump them with.

}(

But I'm only partly kidding.

These people do not want to horse trade. They want to set the agenda and pretend to work across the aisle.

You are perhaps not familiar with how they have treated the opposition party for the last 6 years: trying to have Democrats arrested for using "unapproved" rooms for meetings; relegating John Conyers' hearings to a tiny basement room without appropriate equipment to conduct their business; allowing Republicans on the Intelligence Committee to see things that Democrats were never allowed to see; etc., etc.

These people are scum and I for one can hardly wait for some subpoenas to be delivered on their asses. The message of this election was *not* a call for bipartisanship, it was a repudiation of the so-called leadership we have had for the last 6 years. Americans are finally waking up from the nightmare that has been foisted upon us by corrupt, classist Republic lawmakers and their servile press enablers. Here's hoping it is not too late to undo the damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. You're missing the point.

The reason to trade horses with the Republicans is not because of "playing nice", it's because they have horses we want and trading is the only way to aquire them.

The Republicans have refused to compromise with the Dems for six years because they could afford to; I imagine that whichever party next controls all three branches of government will do the same. But right now neither side can afford that if they want to get any legislation passed.

If we want to undo the damage, we need to persuade the Republicans not to veto the relevant laws. Neither saying please nor blustering will achieve that; it's going to take horse-trading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Actually I am not missing the point...
...it's just that I think your suggested approach, which makes sense in normal times, will simply not work with this bunch and will, in fact, be counterproductive.

I'm pinning my hopes on investigations.

I respect your position -- did not mean to be insulting or anything -- but in case it's not obvious, I really, really detest and distrust this bunch. And every time our side has attempted to negotiate with them, we lose. Now that we have at long last won a national mandate, and sent a clear message of repudiation -- it is not time, just yet, to reach across the aisle. First we need to spend a good 6 months turning the screws, and regaining a little respect on the Hill. As I've said many times before, the only way to get respect from this crew is to be tough. So that's what we should do.

Now of course, it's easy to make absolutist statements like the above; I recognize that it won't be so cut and dried. But I really, really hope that the Democrats do not lead with a "Kumbaya" attitude; it will erase the gains we have just so painfully achieved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sure the Iraqis have lots of them.
Throw those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. the middle finger bone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. The anthrax investigation.
They finished that and found the guy responsible, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. War crimes won't be punishable by torture. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. A splintered sharp chicken bone? I understand your post

however; for today at least I cannot offer them anything. They deserve nothing.

I believe that 60 votes in the Senate are needed to overcome a veto, so we'd need 8 Repubs (I've included Lieberman as a Dem).

I am sure there are 8 'moderate' republicans we can talk with, but the rest can choke on the chicken bone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Would anyone trade impeachment for a "pass anything you want
clause" from the repukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. They don't deserve bones, they deserve threats n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC