To: Toby06
AP is reporting.....I guess they just decided to give it to Webb before the final votes are counted. Will Allen concede? Probably.
11 posted on 11/08/2006 5:36:45 PM PST by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies >
______________________________________________________________
To: West Coast Conservative
Typical of today's new stripped-down MSM, the AP article has a half dozen words, no numbers, no explanation, no date, no time.
This thread is meaningless. Might request deleting it.
12 posted on 11/08/2006 5:36:48 PM PST by muawiyah
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
______________________________________________________________
To: West Coast Conservative
Well....I am not surprised.
We have lost 2 of our best Senators..
Thank you to all of the Republicans that "punished" Bush over anything...
13 posted on 11/08/2006 5:36:54 PM PST by Txsleuth (EVERYONE VOTE---AND VOTE REPUBLICAN,...even if you have to hold your nose!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
______________________________________________________________
To: Jrabbit
I guess AP gets to call elections not the states secretary of state. Another office to abolish I guess??
18 posted on 11/08/2006 5:37:48 PM PST by samadams2000 (Somebody important make....THE CALL!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies >
__________________________________________________________
To: West Coast Conservative
Well, there goes the Supreme Court. Based on today's oral argument, it looks like Kennedy has totally gone over to the dark side (he appears ready to strike down the Partial Birth Abortion ban), so we've now got five total libs on the Court and four moderate conservatives. When Stevens croaks we're not going to be able to replace him with anyone good, so be prepared for years of liberal activism on the bench.
19 posted on 11/08/2006 5:37:51 PM PST by NinoFan
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
_______________________________________________________________
To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Since Virginia is one of those states that uses electronic voting machines with no paper trail, there isn't any way to do a real recount. All they can do is to add up the numbers again.
That's not going to help. The answer is to require some sort of verifiable paper trail. Here in MN, we use optical readers. The ballot I filled out will be available for a recount, if necessary.
This electronic voting with no audit trail is wrong.
24 posted on 11/08/2006 5:38:40 PM PST by MineralMan (Non-evangelical atheist)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies >
_____________________________________________________________
To: West Coast Conservative
Virginia will say who wins this election, NOT the FREAKING AP!
25 posted on 11/08/2006 5:38:49 PM PST by GottaLuvAkitas1 (Ronald Reagan is the TRUE "Father Of Our Country".)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
__________________________________________________________________
To: popdonnelly
It's all computer though. All the recount would do is verify that the printout is legible on the machines. If so, the number on the printout is matched to the ledger. If not legible, it is reprinted out. That is it. No dimples, chads, whatever.
31 posted on 11/08/2006 5:40:36 PM PST by dogbyte12
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies >
________________________________________________________________
To: Jedi Master Pikachu
No, no, no, no, no.
Don't you get it. There are no recounts, voter fraud, voting irregularities, hanging chads, or preprogrammed diebold machines if it turns out that the democrat is on top.
35 posted on 11/08/2006 5:40:52 PM PST by frankiep (Beer - the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies >
___________________________________________________________
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1735208/posts#comment?q=1