Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do we now have veto override power?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:04 PM
Original message
Do we now have veto override power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not without help I don't think
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 09:05 PM by shadowknows69
It's 2/3rd of both houses right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think so.
You need two thirds to override a veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. A big negative on that one n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Im sure we come pretty damn close...I know we can break the veto in the Senate on Stem Cell research
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 09:07 PM by HappyWeasel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, really, we're not --on edit: stem cells _maybe_, most issues not a chance n/t
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 09:08 PM by Concerned GA Voter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not unless we get some of the GOP to break their lock step dance routine
We are not quite there yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Takes a 2/3rd's vote to override. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:06 PM
Original message
not without assistance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. not without assistance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. We'll have to work on that and the Super Majority for 2008.
And of course the Whitehouse.:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Time to execute leverage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. According to Wikipedia....
"In the United States, Congress can override a presidential veto by having a 2/3 majority vote in both the House of Representatives and Senate, thus signing the bill into law despite the president's veto. However, a bill may not be overridden if it is a pocket veto. The veto override is an example of checks and balances."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veto_override
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Never mind about impeachment.
Concentrate right now on dismantling this One Party government, piece by piece, and restoring oversight & accountability.

"We" now have the power to set Committee agendas, conduct investigations, and issues subpoenas. A later goal would be restoring the FCC's Fairness Doctrine. That would cut the ballz off those RW screamers.

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. We have impeachment power, and that trumps the veto any day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Um..nope.. gotta have 66 for that..66 SURE votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC