Glib Acumen
(57 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:09 PM
Original message |
|
The first priority for Democrats should be to make Bush stop murdering Arabs. Funding for the bombings and shootings of Arabs can be cut off by Congress. The racist atrocities are not justified by greed. This is justice. This is logical.
|
Chico Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Also torturing and raping.. and stealing from. |
knowbody0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
killing people to give them freedom is insane. Like Hugo Chavez said today, the people have spoken, the world watched us reject this criminal administration. We have the ball and must run with this.
|
Greeby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If you told Shrub to stop murdering Arabs, he'd just start murdering some other group
|
stellanoir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
4. violence begets violence begats more violence. |
|
the record's stuck, the record's stuck, the record's stuck. . .
|
AntiWarPoster
(440 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
5. you think arabs are the only ones dying? |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 10:17 PM by AntiWarPoster
what about the troops? they're just as important
bring troops home
|
Glib Acumen
(57 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. The troops should leave Iraq starting today. |
|
The troops are dying for greedy old men. They should be taken out of Afghanistan starting today.
|
Glib Acumen
(57 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Congress is the branch that can declare war. Can it declare peace? Can Congress order the President to stop the war?
|
AntiWarPoster
(440 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. not without a veto proof majority |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 10:23 PM by AntiWarPoster
i don' think.
they could refuse to approve the next funding packages but that might be risky
|
bigriver
(110 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-08-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Looks like someone's very CONCERN'd. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message |