Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An alternate theory on Rumsfeld lie...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 01:46 AM
Original message
An alternate theory on Rumsfeld lie...
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 01:48 AM by tasteblind
Maybe Rumsfeld saw the subpoenas on the wall and decided to resign, but is letting Bush take the credit/blame for booting him.

That would explain why Bush said Rumsfeld would stay on...he probably thought he would.

But once Rumsfeld saw the extent of the power switch on Capitol Hill, and knew that DOD expenditures would be investigated thoroughly, he scampered away like the rest of the GOP, leaving Bush to his fate.

Makes a lot more sense than, "Win or lose, Bob Gates was going to be the nominee."

Edit: And everyone knows that Bush would say whatever Rumsfeld told him to say. We all know that Cheney and Rumsfeld run the show while Bush distracts the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your right. "It's the subpoenas stupid."
Rummy's a damn war criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced this is what actually happened.
Bush never had the authority to fire Rumsfeld. Constitutional authority, yes, but Rumsfeld and Cheney were always in charge of him, not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
az chela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was readin about Bob Gates earlier and he sounds as bad
as Rummy.What do we know about him???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Former CIA Director.
That's all I know, and it's never a good sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
az chela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I read that he claimed Saddam had weapons of mass destruction
and is very close to Poppy bush.Thats scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't believe for ONE second that this 'decision' was made
until the wee hours of this morning, when * and company knew that their goose was cooked.

* HAS to start looking like he's doing something about Iraq (other than loading his crooked pal's pockets with money.) Getting rid of Rummy was an easy way to 'look' like he has a plan, without actually having one. I really think that someone in the White House woke up for ten seconds and realized that if the repukes don't start DOING something about Iraq, come January of 2007, the Dems WILL do something about it and get all the credit. That is the last thing the repukes want, with the Dems in control, and 2008 looming in front of them. They don't want another November, 2006. Too bad. We're going to give them one. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC