elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 12:13 PM
Original message |
| NEW CONGRESS vs. OLD CONGRESS: more bipartisan, less bisexual. |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 12:14 PM by elehhhhna
carry on;-)
|
| deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Hey, I don't mind bisexuality.. |
|
as long as you're not in the closet while actively railing against other bisexuals. :)
|
| swimboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. You have to realize more of both would be better. |
|
Gettin' over it is gettin' there.
|
| elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Everything that's done openly is fine by me... |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 12:28 PM by elehhhhna
the only gay marriage I oppose is one to an unuspecting straight person
|
| valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. You mean less BUYsexual. nt |
| ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Do you have something against Bisexuals? |
|
:shrug:
I've been noticing some digs and slams in your posts against GLBT people. Is there a problem?
|
| elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. I have a huge problem with closeted politicians who repeatedly vote against equal civil rights. Yes. |
| ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. Your post is a lot less specific than that. |
|
It looks like it could be a smear against bisexuals. You may want to be more careful who/how you smear.
|
| elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 02:26 PM by elehhhhna
|
| tjwmason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. WOW! That is sooooooooooooooooooo hilarious. |
|
I mean, punning bipartisan and bisexual. I don't know how I can remain on my chair with all of this laughing. I haven't heard humour with that sophistication since I was 10. You get to comment on the combination of a Democratic Congress and Republican Presidency...and be incredibly insulting and rude to bisexuals all in one go - I am totally in awe.
|
| elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. Are you a secret bisexual married Congressman who votes against gay rights? |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 02:27 PM by elehhhhna
No?
Didn't think so.
Guess that post wasn't about you, then.
|
| ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 11. I guess he missed the word "secret"... |
| tjwmason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. I must have been laughing so much |
|
at the elevated humour that tears were streaming down my eyes and I could read it.
I'll just go and sit in the naughty boys' corner with my hat on. :dunce:
|
| HarukaTheTrophyWife
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 14. Shhhh....that's because it's a secret. |
| Sapphocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I guess it was a joke, but it went over like a lead balloon, AFAIC.
And I'm not even bisexual.
|
| NMMNG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |
| 16. Can't have any bisexuals in Congress now |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
