Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saddam Hussein's Trial was a sham.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:05 PM
Original message
Saddam Hussein's Trial was a sham.....
I have no love for him and in fact he will get what he deserves but his trial was a joke.

Why wasn't he tried at The Hague, like Milosevich was, instead of a kangaroo court in Iraq?

The answer is because Saddam Hussein had "the goods" on complicit US administrations in the past who helped him when he carried out his worst crimes.

That information can never be allowed to be inculcated by the American people. Interesting how we were allowed to see O.J. Simpson's trial but not Saddam Hussein.

Ramsey Clark had this to say about it..

"In international law, anyone accused of crime has the right to be tried by a confident, independent and impartial court, and there can be no fair trail without those qualities," he said.

"The special court in Iraq was created by the Iraqi governing council, which is nothing more than a creation of the US military occupation and has no authority in law as a criminal court,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shams, lies, distortions, fraud: whatever it takes to further the reichous 'puke cause
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Gauger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I find it interesting that he was charged
and convicted of something that was not a crime. I thought for a while that he was being charged with the massacre at Halabja, but in fact he was charged with signing 148 execution orders. All of these victims had been duly convicted in a court of law. Bush has done the same thing 152 times. If one is going to argue that Iraqi courts were illegitimate at that time and that signing those orders was a crime against humanity because of it - well, then, surely Saddam's execution is also a crime against humanity. The court in which he was tried was set up by an occupying power. It was not a court established by the legitimate government of Iraq. Yet an execution order will be signed from his conviction and he will be killed just like his 148 victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not_a_robot Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I also feel.
I think he knew too much and a lot would have come out about the war in iraq, his deal with daddy bush and others, and of course, the origin of his weapons. A more public and thorough trial would have uncovered too many accomplices and enablers for the bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. How can you have a real trial without a real country
So far it looks like we are the occupiers.

We had Iran/Contra where we were dealing under the table with Iran to get guns to S. American countries, then we cozy up to Saddam to stab Iran in the back. What a plan they had. Yup, they didn't want exposed U.S. dealing in that area. Keep the oil gushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. His trial is one big Abu Grab. Not sure how it's a fair trial, but oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC