Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Voters change?...or is it just that the elections were not stolen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:14 PM
Original message
Did Voters change?...or is it just that the elections were not stolen?
According to Thom Hartmann the exit polls matched the election results.

Where as in 2000,2002 and 2004 much of the exit polls were far off!!

Ummmm... Sounds like the rethugs didn't steal the elections this time and let the true results show...

What else explains it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dems got so many votes that the stolen and suppressed votes weren't enough
IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. How do you KNOW the election wasn't stolen?
Just because "we wouldn't do that?" Hmmm. Maybe the election was handed to us. I don't think so, I'm just trying to point out that with these machines we just don't know. We'll never know. We still have to fight to eliminate the black boxes and force the election industry to open up its code for inspection.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We know becuase the result MATCHES the Exit Polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good answer!
Precisely.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I just told my dad the same thing yesterday
I really think that this time, knowing the heat that the voting machine companies have on them lately, they actually let this one go through like it should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. i think the voters changed
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 03:23 PM by shanti
i heard time and again about how people were going to vote straight dem, and they had never voted dem in their lives. the groundswell was too great for diebold to work this time, AND we were WATCHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Voters with a vengence! Put the tsunami wave on that ass!
We just totally overwhelmed any attempts at cheating, and there WAS cheating and irregularities going on everywhere, but especially in OHIO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's actually a combination of both.
The DRE's had become such a HUGH topic in the Headlines everywhere, and there were thousands of poll watchers this time, plus they knew what to look for!

The other part is that there was a very large turnout for this election! People of all Parties were upset with what thesingle controlled gov't has done over the past 6 years, and they were angry enough to make a change.

Were there still problemswith the voting process? Absolutely! I can only hope that the NEW Congress can enact some necessary changes to eliminate these problems in future elections. If the cures are reasonable, they should be able to get mutual concensus and get some fixes passed into law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Personally, I believe that George HAD to let the Democrats
win because it gives him the excuse he was looking for to get out of Iraq. As long as the Republicans were in power and he had made such a big deal about "staying the course," he couldn't back away, but now in this new spirit of "bipartisanship," he can fire Rummy and take a new direction. This way if conditions start improving in Iraq, he can take credit for cooperating with the Democrats, and if things don't work out, he can blame us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC