Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 04:19 PM
Original message |
Why can't they interview Democrats and ask Dems what they are going to do |
|
instead of interviewing Republicans telling Dems what to do?:mad:
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Crap, are they starting that shit up again? |
|
I was so thrilled the other night to see Blitzer interview Pelosi. I thought, now FINALLY Dems are going to be allowed to SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES, rather than having a Republican make crap up about them.
|
solara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Because that would be fair and balanced |
|
and logical...responsible. It is what real journalists would do, but they are 'teevee toys' Don't expect them to change just because Congress has.
|
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-09-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 04:43 PM by Dyedinthewoolliberal
is captured by the special interests who prefer things Republican. They will now spend the next two years putting everything done by the Dems under a microscope looking for as many "AHA" moments as they can find. The tone of some of the comments already indicate they fully expect the Dems to drive the country right into the ditch. As if we aren't already there! It's as if the United States has always been controlled in DC by the GOP and this election has been some sort of 'twilight zone' experience. :shrug: Now is when I'd like to see Mr. Dean get the message out as loud and oftne as possible. Something like, Dems stand for a decent minimum wage, some kind of universal health care and using our military as it was intended...........
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |