Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCaskill on voting to confirm John Bolton: "Probably"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:48 PM
Original message
McCaskill on voting to confirm John Bolton: "Probably"
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 05:49 PM by hiaasenrocks
She said she would want to know more about him and ask some questions, but that she was a believer that the president gets some picks. She said she would tend to be deferential to the president on things like this.

EDIT: My source is a live interview on Hardball that just ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:59 PM
Original message
Just happened. Live interview on Hardball.
Watch the replay or check the transcript when it goes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh Fuck. I want my money back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good fucking god, if we play nice with these fuckheads he lose. Period. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wha?
I know she's been campaigning, but from where? Under a rock?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. They want the hearing in December, if thats true.
She won't have a say in the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ugghhhhh
We did win, didn't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Relax.
We're not to the confirmation stage yet. Much can change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. And so it begins!
We need her office address and number. An e-mail address would be swell, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Great.
All the quizzing and letter sending I did for the United Nations Association will probably have been a waste of time (like so much else).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. So you guys in Missouri elected her might "enlighten" her about
Bolton. Just a suggestion with no snark intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it's still "don't give them ammunition" season.
I'll wait to reserve judgment on statements like this until the 110th Congress is officially convened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why couldn't she have said "no comment yet?"
Is she known as a conservative Dem? I believe Tester and Webb seems like good Democrats at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hope she won't start Jean Schmidting on everybody.
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 05:57 PM by Snotcicles
We need a thirty day moratorium on open pie holes for the newbies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Come on.
Better write some letters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. The election is over....we swallowed all the stuff...no more.
I think now we have the right, after being on board in 04 and 06, to stand up and holler over stuff like this.

They as candidates are given positions to take. It is showing now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bolton Doesn't Stand A Chance
A different playing field coming up here folks. Hopefully McCaskill doesn't get seated on the Judiciary committee so she may never get to vote on Bolton's fate. With Leahy, Levin and Biden at the helm of major committees now, they control the process and that's all that counts. Repugnicans like Specter and Voinovich no longer have the tight leash of Rove and Frist around them and they can read the Tea leaves. If you think Liebermann's gonna be a pain in our ass, just wait til you see Specter get some payback for all the hoop jumping he had to do to keep his Judiciary chairmanship. He may actually become the Senator from Scotland.

Kos has the list of Senate seats coming up in '08. There are a lot of Repugnicans who are in blue or blue-leaning areas and aren't gonna hitch their wagons to people and issues that poll in the 30's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Specter
Oh, God, I hope he's ready to tell the puppet masters to STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Politics, and politicians, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. His hearing will likely be in the lameduck Congress
So she probably won't have a say in the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. Look, McCaskill is the best Missouri offers. Get used to it.
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 06:02 PM by Selatius
I don't mean to sound harsh, but you're damn lucky to have somebody who is even close to the liberal quadrant from the South or the Midwest in the Senate:

http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Claire_McCaskill.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. But IMO saying this was just unnecessary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Whoa. If your response was meant for the OP (me)
then calm down. I didn't say I think she's wrong. Let's wait and see how the hearings go and see what she does (if the hearing even takes place when she's in office).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. No, there are plenty of good Dems in Missouri
she's not the best of the lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Define best, that's the big question.
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 06:11 PM by Selatius
If by best you mean the person can win the primary and get elected by the general population of a Midwestern state such as Missouri, then McCaskill is the best. That's how I defined it, and the vote count backs it up, too. If by best you mean liberal, then I'm sure there are people far better than McCaskill. Your only problem is they're blocked by a more conservative population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Yes, best as in electable
if memory serves correctly, she ran roughshod over other Dems in her primary. She created quite a divide in the state party a few years ago when she ran against the incumbent Dem governor in the primary, won, and went on to lose the race for governor to Baby Doc Blunt. She's been successful against fellow Dems because her wealthy husband and his friends put a lot of money into her primary campaigns against Dems.

I'm glad she was elected, but she will have to be watched.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Oh, so she can augment her campaigning power with a large wallet, huh?
One day we will pass a federal clean elections law like Arizona and Maine have passed for their state legislatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. It helped her at one time
but no doubt her most recent race required a massive infusion of funds from the DSCC and DNC. She has to be a team player now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. they are going to vote on Bolton
or at least * wants to in this session. McCaskill doesn't get sworn in till Jan. when Dems control the house...and then there is no chance he will come up for nomination...or if he does bring him up after Jan. it won't pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Surprising they would ask her that question
even more surprising that she answered it.

Someone needs to have a talk with her to remind her how much money was invested by Dems in her race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. This makes me feel ill
McCaskill said she will be deferential on things like this. I hope that doesn't include his nominations for Supreme Court as well. Junior doesn't deserve any deference just because he holds the office of President, which he has thoroughly defiled. So, why does the he "get some picks"?

Holy merde! Bolton is devisive, narrow minded and arrogant...just like Junior. What a perfect 'pick' to be Ambassador to the U.N. -especially when we are trying to build new bridges with the world. Yeah, appeasement is just what this administration needs. :sarcasm:

Wasn't she just elected? Geez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. We will be able to kill justices in committee
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. I'm not worried (yet)
She knows that the question was a freebie, because she won't have a vote on this. This was a throwaway for Southern Missouri - and that's fine. No harm, no foul.

Her voting record probably won't be perfect, but put her against Mary Landrieu and she'll look like a flaming liberal. She's smart and she'll do what's right. Remember, she didn't come from the House - she was a State Auditor. It's going to take her some time on certain national issues. She'll be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. It was obvious whe knew very little about it.... I think she'll vote w/Dem leadership.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. is she on the committee? Can he get out of the committee?
if not, it doesn't matter...or is a damned good reason not to put her on the committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
31. Chaffee just said that he wouldn't confirm.
Don't sweat it. All is well re: Bolton. He'll never get the position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. Here's proof we can't look to Washington for change. Its up to us.
McCaskill has just revealed she's working for someone else other than her constituents.

Why in the world would she vote for such an obvious abuser?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Ok I am seeing a trend in my own thinking here
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 06:40 PM by solara
I am still paranoid. I guess that is one of the legacies from the past 6 years. Winning both houses almost seems too good to be true, so I guess I am hyper sensitive to seeing anything that may 'seem' off course.

Right now anything that looks like a back flip is going to set me off. So I am going to slow down, take a deep breath and just pay attention. January is a few months off, and no telling what Junior is gonna try to pull off while he still can. I will keep my eyes on that..

Until there is something definitive, I just have to trust that the people who are going to be sworn in are better than the people they replaced.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
38. Luckily, Chafee is fighting this even in his defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
39. He will NOT be confirmed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
40. Give her a break. She's not even in office yet. Let her take a look at the issues
before you freak out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Don't get hysterical.
I just posted the news. I didn't say I disagreed with her at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Who's hysterical?
And I was talking mostly to the people in the thread who are freaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. Here we go all ready
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
44. It's not the time to be confrontational on an issue such as this two days after the election.
I don't like Bolten at all, and I think there needs to hearings on his nomination eventhough he is the incumbent ambassador. The hearings should focus on his performance at the U.N. during the time he has served.

But again, now is not the time to be confrontational on an issue such as this. Just let the process play itself out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
45. Sorry to dredge this up again, but I have a question
why are we worried about how McCaskill will vote if the Bolton nomination will be going through the Lame Duck Congress and not the new one. I thought Bush was going to try and hammer it through before the new Congress convenes. No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
46. Fuck ... another pushover.
Great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4theheart Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Hopefully this isn't a sign of things to come but...
We'll see how this plays out, she's not even in office yet. I have a feeling that the whip durbin, and many other prominent and powerful democrats are going to quickly remind her of the decisive role they played in raising money for her and getting the stem cell issue on the balot to energize her campaign. Let's give the party enforcers some time to work their magic, hell we didn't even know what that would consist of untill just a few days ago. We brought her in and we can take her out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC