Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Troops fear Rumsfeld's exit will end their Iraq mission

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:37 PM
Original message
Troops fear Rumsfeld's exit will end their Iraq mission
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2446536,00.html

Half of America and the upper echelons of the US military may be cheering Donald Rumsfeld’s resignation from the post of Defence Secretary, but there was no rejoicing yesterday among those most directly affected by his decisions: the frontline soldiers in Iraq.

Troops expressed little pleasure at the departure of the man responsible for their protracted deployment to a hostile country where 2,839 of their comrades have died.

Indeed, some members of the 101st Airborne Division and other troops approached by The Times as they prepared to fly home from Baghdad airport yesterday expressed concern that Robert Gates, Mr Rumsfeld’s successor, and the Democrat-controlled Congress, might seek to wind down their mission before it was finished.

Mr Rumsfeld “made decisions, he stuck with them and he did what he thought was right, whether people agreed with it, liked it, or not”, Staff Sergeant Frank Notaro said. He insisted that Iraq was better off now than before the war.

Staff Sergeant Michael Howard said: “It’s a blow to the military. He was a good Secretary of Defence. He kept us focused. He kept the leaders focused. It’s going to be hard to fill his shoes.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. THANK YOU SIR. MAY HAVE ANOTHER? Unfuckingbelievable.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernBelle82 Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is unbelievable
I remember there was a guy who happened to be from my home town who questioned Rummy on why they didn't have proper armor for their vehicles and Rummy was just so insulting to them. Instead of giving them a proper answer or something he just so insulted them. So they would rather have a crappy guy there who gives a shit about them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I fear Bob Gates will turn their mission into Vietnam: coups & strong men.
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 08:53 PM by Democrats_win
U.S. Backed government in Vietnam:

First:
The Diệm regime had been initially able to cope with the insurgency with the aid of U.S. materiel and advisers, and, by 1962, seemed to be gaining the upper hand.

In 1963, a crackdown by Diệm's forces was launched against Buddhist monks protesting discriminatory practices and demanding a political voice. Diem's repression of the protests sparked the so-called Bhuddist Revolt,

Second:
Eventually, the administration determined that Diem was unwilling to further modify his policies and the decision was made to remove U.S. support from the regime.

The president was overthrown by the military and later executed along with his brother.

Chaos ensued in the security and defense systems of South Vietnam and, once again, Hanoi took advantage of the situation

--
This is only the tip of the iceberg on how the U.S. government backing of the Vietnam government was screwed up. Hopefully someone at DU will remind Americans what a mess this small part of the Vietnam fiasco was. We're just beginning on this path in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Fear? I'm absolutely sure of it.
They don't have any other way to go.

But what I'm not sure of, is whether they have enough power to put a strongman in place, or whether any other party might also be backing one who will be stronger than ours, which means the civil war will continue, but with more defined structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't believe it. Then why did all the generals revolt against him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Any wounded generals?
The emotional feeling is just not the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. But he has them over there like sitting ducks, without proper body armor or armored vehicles,
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 09:08 PM by tblue
allowed Graner et al to take the fall for Abu Ghraib and get sentenced to Leavenworth, keeps stop lossing them. And they have affection for this guy?

Oh, I know why: Stockholm Syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's always good to have another perspective. I wonder, though,
how widespread this opinion is among the troops?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. I doubt these comments reflect the views of everyone serving in Iraq.
Besides, it seems natural to want to believe, when your life is at stake and you have no control over your assignment, that what you are required to do is a worthwhile venture. I feel very sorry for the troops. None of this mess is their fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. There's not a chance in hell that Staff Sergeant Michael Howard knows
anything about the discussions between Rummy and the Generals.

He heard it on the radio. I wonder who would have told him that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Damn straight it will be hard to fill his shoes.
They're already overflowing with crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. ??? hard to believe nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Since when did making decisions and sticking...

... with them blindly become such a noble virtue?

"That Bush is a swell guy, the way he feels about an issue on Monday is the same way he'll feel about it on Wednesday, regardless of what happens on Tuesday"... Stephen Cobert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is The Onion, right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Surprising, to say the least - it's interesting to note those troops were ...
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 08:51 PM by smalll
"approached by The Times as they prepared to fly home from Baghdad airport yesterday." I take that to mean these were men who had just finished their time in Iraq. And in a funny way, it would make sense that soldiers who have served there might often feel like this. If they believe that there is any chance that Iraq can stabilize and become free, they might want us to keep going. For their fellow soldiers who died or were wounded, and for themselves - for that long hard year (or so) of their own lives they sunk into the project. They're never getting that year back you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. A B'rer Rabbit kind of fear
Doncha' think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Steady diet of Rush Limbaugh on Armed Forces Radio, IMHO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. There are still Vietnam vets...
who believe we could have actually won!

For the most part, soldiers and Marines haven't actually been following what's happening at the SecDef level. They usually are more interested in the "keeping my ass wired to my body" level.

When they get home and out and educated, they'll know just how fucked this whole thing was. That's when they're gonna hurt....knowing the US has pissed away 3000 of their comrades lives, and screwed up their young lives.

Some of the troops in Iraq today will, undoubtedly, listen to scumbags like Limpballs and fall for the bullshit line that the US could have won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. I would like to see them interview those who signed up for the Appeal
to Congress for Redress!
http://www.appealforredress.org/index.php

I Know lots did not like to go and then be in a no win situation and of course all who gave all for what Halliburton to earn high theft profits. My Son spent two tours there helping to restore electrical power. Now I have to hope he does not show any bad effect's from his time there in a country polluted by Depleted Uranium and given water treated by unskilled Haliburton employees that had not a clue what they were doing to ensure the water was really purified. One employee was dismayed to find that the people before him were giving the troops the backwash from the RO units instead of the purified water.

http://web.archive.org/web/20030602211200/


October 17, 2006,Will be remembered as the Enabling day of the 21st Century!
"The government will make use of these powers only insofar as they are essential for carrying out vitally necessary measures..."
~Adolf Hitler, March 23, 1933, before the German Parliament (Reichstag) as he urged them to pass his "Enabling Act"





Fascism Accomplished!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. I am a precinct judge and on election day I helped Iraq vet cancel
an overseas ballot.

In the discussion we had he told me that during the 04 election the military went out of their way to make sure all the troops had the chance to vote.

The bad part was they were told to vote for Bush because he would make sure that they would get all the equipment they needed.

I had listen to this and not laugh, it was hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. What?
Maybe they interviewed the guys with the "Help us Jon Carry we're stuck in Irak" sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. The troops I know just want to come home, feel no good is being done there now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well, just because not everyone in the military is a moron
it doesn't mean that there are no morons in the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. This guy speaks for the majority of 140K Troops?
Uh, don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Either that or they didn't interview the guy standing behind him
holding the gun to his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. It's worth noting
that the Times of London is a Murdoch owned rag.

Take it with a grain of salt. This article speaks like propaganda typical of Murdoch's papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC